AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sze, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jolesz, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sze, G.
Right arrow Articles by Jolesz, F. A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 13, Issue 5 1383-1392, Copyright © 1992 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Fast spin-echo imaging in the evaluation of intradural disease of the spine

G Sze, M Merriam, K Oshio and FA Jolesz
Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

PURPOSE: Fast spin echo (FSE) images were compared with conventional images in 46 patients with intradural spinal disease to determine their accuracy in the detection and delineation of lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The images were interpreted by two neuroradiologists, who read individually. A total of 720 blinded readings formed the basis for this evaluation. A gold standard for each patient was selected, based on the blinded readings of the conventional studies. RESULTS: In the sagittal plane, the FSE sequences were found to have an accuracy of 93% and 93% for the first reader and 93% and 85% for the second reader. For the axial plane, the corresponding figures were 86% and 82% for the first reader and 64% and 77% for the second reader. These figures compared favorably with conventional sequences. Similar delineation of lesions was noted in 78% of cases. In the remaining cases, there were no significant trends. CONCLUSION: Because of these findings, FSE sequences appear as accurate as conventional sequences. In this study, they were capable of supplanting conventional sequences in the evaluation of intradural pathology of the spine in the sagittal plane, although conventional sequences were still preferred in the axial plane.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. T. Gray, W. Hollingworth, C. C. Blackmore, M. A. Alotis, B. I. Martin, S. D. Sullivan, R. A. Deyo, and J. G. Jarvik
Conventional Radiography, Rapid MR Imaging, and Conventional MR Imaging for Low Back Pain: Activity-based Costs and Reimbursement
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 669 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Baskaran, F. S. Pereles, E. J. Russell, S. A. Georganos, A. Shaibani, K. A. Spero, E. A. Krupinski, A. Zhang, and J. P. Finn
Myelographic MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine with a 3D True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Technique: Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. M. Quencer
The American Journal of Neuroradiology 1980-1999 Where We Have Been: Where We Are Going
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 1 - 8.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. S. Ross
Newer Sequences for Spinal MR Imaging: Smorgasbord or Succotash of Acronyms?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 1999; 20(3): 361 - 373.
[Full Text]