AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sostman, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sostman, H. D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 14, Issue 3 721-729, Copyright © 1993 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Poststenotic signal loss in MR angiography: effects of echo time, flow compensation, and fractional echo

AJ Evans, DB Richardson, R Tien, JR MacFall, LW Hedlund, ER Heinz, O Boyko and HD Sostman
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

PURPOSE: To evaluate with steady and pulsatile flow the influence of echo time, gradient strength and duration, and flow compensation on the degree of turbulent signal loss, factors that have been implicated in MR angiography's overestimation of the degree of stenosis. METHODS: We examined poststenotic turbulent flow in two models, one that created a turbulent jet and another that simulated a plaque-like stenosis. The pulse sequence used in these experiments allowed for a single variable (flow compensation, echo time, or gradient strength) to be varied without changing the others. RESULTS: Poststenotic signal loss can lead to overestimation of the degree of a stenosis. The area of signal loss in the turbulent jet was influenced by fractional echo and flow compensation, but not by echo time. We found that the dominant mechanism in poststenotic signal loss is related to the strength and duration of the imaging gradients. CONCLUSIONS: Flow-compensated sequences with reduced gradient strength and duration will reduce poststenotic signal loss and may lead to more accurate estimations of the extent of stenotic lesions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, J. Chiras, D. Dormont, and C. Marsault
Proximal Great Vessels of Aortic Arch: Comparison of Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography
Radiology, December 1, 2003; 229(3): 697 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Sugita, E. Sugimura, M. Itoh, T. Ohisa, S. Takahashi, and N. Fujita
Pseudolesion of the Bile Duct Caused by Flow Effect: A Diagnostic Pitfall of MR Cholangiopancreatography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2003; 180(2): 467 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, M. Duyme, M. Sahel, A. Zouaoui, and C. Marsault
Carotid Artery Stenosis: Prospective Comparison of CT, Three-dimensional Gadolinium-enhanced MR, and Conventional Angiography
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]