AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lipow, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Silverman, C. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lipow, K. L.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 3 571-579, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

The value of MR in differentiating subligamentous from supraligamentous lumbar disk herniations

CS Silverman, L Lenchik, PM Shimkin and KL Lipow
Department of Radiology, Bridgeport Conn. Hospital 06610, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of MR criteria in differentiating subligamentous from supraligamentous lumbar disk herniations. METHODS: A retrospective review of surgical reports and MR images of 50 patients undergoing first-time lumbar surgery was performed. Three MR imaging criteria were assessed: the presence and integrity of a low-signal- intensity line posterior to the disk herniation, the size of the disk herniation in comparison with the size of the spinal canal, and the presence of disk fragments. Correlation was made with surgical findings to determine the value of these MR criteria in differentiating subligamentous from supraligamentous disk herniations. RESULTS: For determining subligamentous disk herniations: the presence of a continuous low-signal-intensity line posterior to the disk herniation was 29% sensitive, 65% specific, and 42% accurate; disk herniation size less than 50% of the size of the spinal canal was 64% sensitive, 47% specific, and 58% accurate; and the absence of disk fragments was 88% sensitive, 12% specific, and 62% accurate. Combinations of individual MR criteria did not improve diagnostic accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: For differentiating subligamentous from supraligamentous lumbar disk herniations, none of the MR imaging criteria assessed was reliable.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. BODEN
Current Concepts Review - The Use of Radiographic Imaging Studies in the Evaluation of Patients Who Have Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1996; 78(1): 114 - 24.
[Full Text]