AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robert, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaitre, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robert, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lemaitre, L.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 4 755-761, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Congenital cholesteatoma of the temporal bone: MR findings and comparison with CT

Y Robert, S Carcasset, N Rocourt, C Hennequin, F Dubrulle and L Lemaitre
Service de radiologie ouest, Hopital Claude Huriez, Lille, France.

PURPOSE: To describe the MR findings of temporal bone congenital cholesteatoma and MR usefulness in preoperative diagnosis and follow- up, in comparison with CT. METHODS: Seven patients underwent CT and MR studies for facial palsy (n = 3), deafness (n = 3), vertigo (n = 1), tinnitus (n = 1), and otalgia (n = 1). Three patients had for congenital cholesteatoma previously undergone surgery. One of them was free of symptoms and referred for follow-up. Final diagnosis was obtained from surgical data in all the cases but one. RESULTS: Congenital cholesteatoma signal intensity was low or intermediate on T1- weighted images and high on T2-weighted images in all the cases. MR was useful in diagnosis in six cases, helping to differentiate congenital cholesteatoma from other nonenhancing tumors. When temporal bone wall erosion was observed with CT (n = 6), MR ruled out intracranial extension in five cases; in one case, MR found an associated epidermoid cyst of the cerebellopontine angle not identified with CT. However, CT assessed relationships with labyrinthine structures more easily. CONCLUSION: MR and CT are complementary in initial diagnosis and follow- up.