AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oehler, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kurucay, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oehler, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kurucay, S.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 5 1135-1143, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Magnetic susceptibility artifacts on high-resolution MR of the temporal bone

MC Oehler, P Schmalbrock, D Chakeres and S Kurucay
Department of Radiology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine whether signal variations and subtle anatomic deformities observed in high-resolution MR studies of temporal bones were caused by the large susceptibility differences at air-fluid interfaces near the round and oval window. METHODS: A systematic study of healthy subjects and plastic phantoms was conducted. The phantom consisted of a series of cylindrical holes of various small sizes within a solid block of plastic. These holes were partially filled with water and then covered with a reservoir of gelatin to simulate the otic capsule air-water interfaces. On a 1.5-T system, T2-weighted fast spin- echo images and three-dimensional Fourier transform gradient acquisition in steady state images were obtained using dedicated phased- array radio frequency coils. The directions of the frequency and in- plane phase-encoding gradients were swapped, and the receiver bandwidth was changed to demonstrate the dependence of the artifacts on these parameters. RESULTS: The phantom images confirmed and characterized artifacts consistent with magnetic susceptibility differences at the air-water interfaces. There is a combination of signal loss, misregistration in the frequency-encoding direction, and high signal foci related to the air-water interfaces. Furthermore, the artifacts were worse with narrower receiver bandwidth. Similar consistent artifact patterns were seen near the oval and round windows in studies of healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: In high-resolution MR imaging there are significant deformities in the display of the normal anatomy because of magnetic susceptibility.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Allkemper, B. Tombach, W. Schwindt, H. Kugel, M. Schilling, O. Debus, F. Mollmann, and W. Heindel
Acute and Subacute Intracerebral Hemorrhages: Comparison of MR Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T--Initial Experience
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 874 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Naganawa, T. Koshikawa, H. Fukatsu, T. Ishigaki, and T. Fukuta
MR Cisternography of the Cerebellopontine Angle: Comparison of Three-dimensional Fast Asymmetrical Spin-echo and Three-dimensional Constructive Interference in the Steady-state Sequences
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2001; 22(6): 1179 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]