AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shpizner, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shpizner, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shapiro, W. H.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 7 1517-1524, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant

BA Shpizner, RA Holliday, JT Roland, NL Cohen, SB Waltzman and WH Shapiro
Department of Radiology, New York (NY) University Medical Center 10016, USA.

PURPOSE: To present the postoperative radiographic appearance of the multichannel cochlear implant and to suggest criteria for the radiographic evaluation of postimplant patients. METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients, 73 female and 68 male, had multichannel cochlear implants inserted. One hundred thirty-five intraoperative radiographs, 31 postoperative radiographic examinations, and 10 postoperative CT examinations were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: In 135 patients, a Stenver's or anteroposterior projection confirmed the normal placement of the implant by demonstrating the electrodes to be regularly spaced and gently curved within the first turn of the cochlea. The insertion depth was determined by counting the number of electrodes that projected medial to the cochlear promontory. In 5 patients in whom intracochlear placement of the electrode array could not be confirmed on plain radiographs, CT demonstrated the location of the electrode array. In 3 patients with postoperative infections, CT either correctly identified or excluded the presence of a collection beneath the implant. CONCLUSION: Plain radiographs of the temporal bone are sufficient for the postoperative treatment of the majority of postimplant patients. CT should be performed when plain radiographs cannot adequately show the location of the electrode array or if postoperative infection is suspected.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Gupta, S. H. Bartling, S. K. Basu, W. R. Ross, H. Becker, A. Pfoh, T. Brady, and H. D. Curtin
Experimental Flat-Panel High-Spatial-Resolution Volume CT of the Temporal Bone
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2004; 25(8): 1417 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. A. Mecca, W. Wagle, A. Lupinetti, and S. Parnes
Complication of Cochlear Implantation Surgery
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2089 - 2091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]