AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Enzmann, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mehta, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Enzmann, D. R.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 16, Issue 9 1771-1778, Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Improved detection of enhancing and nonenhancing lesions of multiple sclerosis with magnetization transfer

RC Mehta, GB Pike and DR Enzmann
Department of Radiology, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine 94305-5105, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetization transfer imaging can improve visibility of contrast enhancement of multiple sclerosis plaques. METHODS: Fifty-nine enhancing and 63 nonenhancing lesions in 10 patients with multiple sclerosis were evaluated to calculate contrast-to-noise ratios on conventional T1-weighted and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. The signal intensity of the lesion and the background (white matter) were measured on precontrast T1-weighted and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images (800/20/1 [repetition time/echo time/excitations]) and on postcontrast T1-weighted and T1- weighted magnetization transfer images. Mean contrast-to-noise ratios was calculated for all lesions. RESULTS: The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher for enhancing and nonenhancing lesions on T1- weighted magnetization transfer images than on conventional T1-weighted images. For enhancing lesions, the contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher on postcontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer images, 32 +/- 2 compared with 21 +/- 2 on conventional T1-weighted images. Fifty of the 59 enhancing lesions were seen on both the T1- weighted and the T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. Nine enhancing lesions were seen only on the postcontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer images. In addition, of 63 nonenhancing lesions seen on proton-density, T2-weighted, and T1-weighted magnetization transfer images, 16 were not seen on the conventional T1-weighted images. Seven of the 63 nonenhancing lesions and 7 of the 59 enhancing lesions had high signal intensity on the precontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer images suggestive of lipid signal, a finding not seen on the conventional precontrast T1-weighted images. CONCLUSION: Magnetization transfer improves the visibility of enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, because they have a higher contrast-to-noise ratio than conventional postcontrast T1-weighted images. High signal intensity on both nonenhancing and enhancing lesions noted only on precontrast T1-weighted magnetization transfer suggests a lipid signal was unmasked. If magnetization transfer is used in multiple sclerosis patients, a precontrast magnetization transfer image is necessary.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M Filippi
Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2000; 6(5): 320 - 326.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Sugahara, Y. Korogi, Y. Ge, Y. Shigematsu, L. Liang, K. Yoshizumi, M. Kitajima, and M. Takahashi
Contrast Enhancement of Intracranial Lesions: Conventional T1-Weighted Spin-Echo versus Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging Techniques
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1554 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Filippi, N. C Silver, T. A Yousry, and D. H Miller
Newer magnetic resonance techniques and disease activity in multiple sclerosis: new concepts and new concerns
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 1998; 4(6): 469 - 470.
[PDF]