AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roche, J.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roche, J.
Right arrow Articles by Warner, D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 4 677-683, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid sinuses: CT, MR, and MR angiographic appearance of a normal anatomic variation

J Roche and D Warner
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.

PURPOSE: To investigate the imaging characteristics, prevalence, and clinical significance of arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid venous sinuses. METHODS: We reviewed the imaging findings, clinical signs and symptoms, final diagnoses, and follow-up studies of 32 patients with 41 probable arachnoid granulations. RESULTS: On CT scans, arachnoid granulations appear as well-defined filling defects, wholly or partly within a venous sinus, with the same density as cerebrospinal fluid. MR images show these entities as largely isointense with cerebrospinal fluid in all sequences. Linear variations of signal intensity within the granulations are thought to be fibrous septa or vessels. Calcification was present in 3 granulations and altered both CT density and MR signal intensity. The granulations appear as filling defects at MR angiography and at digital subtraction angiography. In some oblique MR angiographic projections, they appear elliptical and could be mistaken for thrombus. No clinical significance could be given to the existence of any of these arachnoid granulations. They occur in 0.3 to 1 of 100 adults in the population. CONCLUSION: Arachnoid granulations in the transverse and sigmoid venous sinuses are common findings seen with thin-section imaging and are usually of no significance.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M.H. Lee, H.-J. Kim, I.H. Lee, S.T. Kim, P. Jeon, and K.H. Kim
Prevalence and Appearance of the Posterior Wall Defects of the Temporal Bone Caused by Presumed Arachnoid Granulations and Their Clinical Significance: CT Findings
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1704 - 1707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J.L. Leach, K. Meyer, B.V. Jones, and T.A. Tomsick
Large Arachnoid Granulations Involving the Dorsal Superior Sagittal Sinus: Findings on MR Imaging and MR Venography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1335 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
V. VandeVyver, M. Lemmerling, B. De Foer, J. Casselman, and K. Verstraete
Arachnoid Granulations of the Posterior Temporal Bone Wall: Imaging Appearance and Differential Diagnosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 610 - 612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Arjona, F Delgado, and E Fernandez-Romero
Intracranial hypertension secondary to giant arachnoid granulations
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2003; 74(4): 418 - 418.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
L. Liang, Y. Korogi, T. Sugahara, I. Ikushima, Y. Shigematsu, M. Takahashi, and J. M. Provenzale
Normal Structures in the Intracranial Dural Sinuses: Delineation with 3D Contrast-enhanced Magnetization Prepared Rapid Acquisition Gradient-Echo Imaging Sequence
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2002; 23(10): 1739 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]