AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Melhem, E. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, R. R.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 4 705-711, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Cervical spondylosis: three-dimensional gradient-echo MR with magnetization transfer

ER Melhem, ML Benson, NJ Beauchamp and RR Lee
Department of Radiology, Boston (Mass) University Medical Center 02167, USA.

PURPOSE: To compare a three-dimensional Fourier transform (3DFT) gradient-echo pulse sequence with magnetization transfer at a short echo time against standard 3DFT gradient-echo technique in the evaluation of cervical spondylosis, specifically addressing the effects of motion and susceptibility artifacts on the dimensions of the neural foramina and contrast at the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-spinal cord interface. METHODS: Ten patients with clinically suspected cervical spondylosis were examined with axial MR imaging using both our standard 3DFT gradient-echo sequence and a 3DFT gradient-echo sequence with a short echo time plus magnetization transfer. Two neuroradiologists measured the transverse dimensions of 22 diseased neural foramina and graded the contrast at the CSF-spinal cord interface. RESULTS: Sixteen of 22 affected neural foramina were larger in the transverse dimension when the magnetization transfer technique was used than when the standard 3DFT gradient-echo sequence was used. In 9 of 10 patients superior contrast was seen at the CSF-spinal cord interface on images obtained with the magnetization transfer technique. CONCLUSIONS: In the cervical spine, 3DFT gradient-echo imaging with magnetization transfer improves contrast and sharpness of the CSF-spinal cord interface at short echo times. This results in less exaggeration of the neural foraminal stenosis as compared with that seen with standard 3DFT gradient-echo techniques owing to the diminished effects of motion and susceptibility artifacts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
V. Baskaran, F. S. Pereles, E. J. Russell, S. A. Georganos, A. Shaibani, K. A. Spero, E. A. Krupinski, A. Zhang, and J. P. Finn
Myelographic MR Imaging of the Cervical Spine with a 3D True Fast Imaging with Steady-State Precession Technique: Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 585 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Ge, R. I. Grossman, J. S. Babb, M. L. Rabin, L. J. Mannon, and D. L. Kolson
Age-Related Total Gray Matter and White Matter Changes in Normal Adult Brain. Part II: Quantitative Magnetization Transfer Ratio Histogram Analysis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2002; 23(8): 1334 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. R. Melhem, R. Itoh, and P. J. M. Folkers
Cervical Spine: Three-dimensional Fast Spin-Echo MR Imaging--Improved Recovery of Longitudinal Magnetization with Driven Equilibrium Pulse
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 283 - 288.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. M. Quencer
The American Journal of Neuroradiology 1980-1999 Where We Have Been: Where We Are Going
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 1 - 8.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. S. Ross
Newer Sequences for Spinal MR Imaging: Smorgasbord or Succotash of Acronyms?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 1999; 20(3): 361 - 373.
[Full Text]