AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yetkin, F. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Prost, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yetkin, F. Z.
Right arrow Articles by Prost, R.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 6 1005-1009, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Effect of motion outside the field of view on functional MR

FZ Yetkin, VM Haughton, RW Cox, J Hyde, RM Birn, EC Wong and R Prost
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Doyne Hospital, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of objects moving outside the field of view on functional MR imaging. METHODS: Echo-Planar image sequences were acquired in the sagittal plane of a stationary phantom or of the head of a volunteer subject while a second phantom was moved periodically outside the field of view. The signal intensity changes in each pixel within the field of view were measured. RESULTS: Movement of the phantom outside the field of view produced signal intensity changes in the field of view that equaled or exceeded typical functional activation without the latency that characterizes activation. The greatest changes occurred at the bottom and top edges in the phantom and at the interfaces in the head. CONCLUSION: If temporally correlated with the performance of a task, movement of objects or tissues outside the field of view may produce artifactual changes in signal intensity. The artifactual signal intensity changes were characterized by their location, greater magnitude, and more rapid rise to maximum than seen with typical "activation."


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M. Fabri, G. Polonara, A. Quattrini, and U. Salvolini
Mechanical Noxious Stimuli Cause Bilateral Activation of Parietal Operculum in Callosotomized Subjects
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2002; 12(4): 446 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. S. Field, Y.-F. Yen, J. H. Burdette, and A. D. Elster
False Cerebral Activation on BOLD Functional MR Images: Study of Low-amplitude Motion Weakly Correlated to Stimulus
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2000; 21(8): 1388 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
G. Polonara, M. Fabri, T. Manzoni, and U. Salvolini
Localization of the First and Second Somatosensory Areas in the Human Cerebral Cortex with Functional MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 1999; 20(2): 199 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text]