AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allen, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allen, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 17, Issue 7 1205-1210, Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Low-cost high-resolution fast spin-echo MR of acoustic schwannoma: an alternative to enhanced conventional spin-echo MR?

RW Allen, HR Harnsberger, C Shelton, B King, DA Bell, R Miller, JL Parkin, RI Apfelbaum and D Parker
Department of Radiology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City 84132, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine whether unenhanced high-resolution T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging provides an acceptable and less expensive alternative to contrast-enhanced conventional T1-weighted spin-echo MR techniques in the diagnosis of acoustic schwannoma. METHODS: We reviewed in a blinded fashion the records of 25 patients with pathologically documented acoustic schwannoma and of 25 control subjects, all of whom had undergone both enhanced conventional spin- echo MR imaging and unenhanced fast spin-echo MR imaging of the cerebellopontine angle/internal auditory canal region. The patients were imaged with the use of a quadrature head receiver coil for the conventional spin-echo sequences and dual 3-inch phased-array receiver coils for the fast spin-echo sequences. RESULTS: The size of the acoustic schwannomas ranged from 2 to 40 mm in maximum dimension. The mean maximum diameter was 12 mm, and 12 neoplasms were less than 10 mm in diameter. Acoustic schwannoma was correctly diagnosed on 98% of the fast spin-echo images and on 100% of the enhanced conventional spin- echo images. Statistical analysis of the data using the kappa coefficient demonstrated agreement beyond chance between these two imaging techniques for the diagnosis of acoustic schwannoma. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistically significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced high-resolution fast spin- echo imaging and enhance T1-weighted conventional spin-echo imaging in the detection of acoustic schwannoma. We believe that the unenhanced high-resolution fast spin-echo technique provides a cost-effective method for the diagnosis of acoustic schwannoma.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. R. Harnsberger and C. Shelton
Mass Screening for Retrocochlear Disorders
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2002; 23(6): 897 - 898.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F. Dubrulle, J. Delomez, A. Kiaei, P. Berger, C. Vincent, F.-M. M. Vaneecloo, and L. Lemaitre
Mass Screening for Retrocochlear Disorders: Low-Field-Strength (0.2-T) versus High-Field-Strength (1.5-T) MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2002; 23(6): 918 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. M. Welker, J. S. Tsuruda, J. R. Hadley, and C. E. Hayes
Radio-frequency Coil Selection for MR Imaging of the Brain and Skull Base
Radiology, October 1, 2001; 221(1): 11 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
K. L. Salzman, H. C. Davidson, H. R. Harnsberger, C. M. Glastonbury, R. H. Wiggins, S. Ellul, and C. Shelton
Dumbbell Schwannomas of the Internal Auditory Canal
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2001; 22(7): 1368 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
M. S. Robinette, C. D. Bauch, W. O. Olsen, and M. J. Cevette
Auditory Brainstem Response and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Acoustic Neuromas: Costs by Prevalence
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2000; 126(8): 963 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. Hans, A. J. Grant, R. D. Laitt, R. T. Ramsden, A. Kassner, and A. Jackson
Comparison of Three-Dimensional Visualization Techniques for Depicting the Scala Vestibuli and Scala Tympani of the Cochlea by Using High-Resolution MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 1999; 20(7): 1197 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. Schmalbrock, D. W. Chakeres, J. W. Monroe, A. Saraswat, B. A. Miles, and D. B. Welling
Assessment of Internal Auditory Canal Tumors: A Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted and Steady-State T2-Weighted Gradient-Echo MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 1999; 20(7): 1207 - 1213.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Naganawa, T. Ito, E. Iwayama, H. Fukatsu, and T. Ishigaki
High-Resolution MR Cisternography of the Cerebellopontine Angle, Obtained with a Three-Dimensional Fast Asymmetric Spin-Echo Sequencein a 0.35-T Open MR Imaging Unit
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 1999; 20(6): 1143 - 1147.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Iwayama, Naganawa, Ito, Fukatsu, Ikeda, Ishigaki, and Ichinose
High-Resolution MR Cisternography of the Cerebellopontine Angle: 2D versus 3D Fast Spin-Echo
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 1999; 20(5): 889 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
K. J. Doyle
Is There Still a Role for Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in the Diagnosis of Acoustic Neuroma?
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, February 1, 1999; 125(2): 232 - 234.
[Full Text] [PDF]