AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Korogi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Furuse, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Korogi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Furuse, M.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 1 135-143, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings

Y Korogi, M Takahashi, T Nakagawa, N Mabuchi, T Watabe, Y Shiokawa, H Shiga, T O'Uchi, H Miki, Y Horikawa, S Fujiwara and M Furuse
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University, School of Medicine, Japan.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether obtaining axial source images from three-dimensional Fourier transform (3DFT) time-of-flight MR angiography improves the detection of intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion if added to maximum-intensity projection (MIP) images. METHODS: The angiograms of 103 patients who had MR angiography for evaluation of possible intracranial vascular disease were reviewed retrospectively in a quantitative and nonquantitative fashion. Diameters of vessels on MR angiograms were measured quantitatively by two reviewers using a magnifying loupe and compared with the results from conventional angiograms. Degrees of stenoocclusive disease were categorized into five classes; an artery with stenosis of 50% or greater was considered to be diseased. Another five observers also reviewed the MIP images with and without source images in a blinded fashion by means of nonquantitative visual inspection. RESULTS: In all, 23 stenoocclusive lesions of 50% or greater were available for review. In the quantitative analysis, with MIP images alone, 14 (78%) of 18 moderate and severe stenoses and four (80%) of five occlusions were identified correctly. The addition of the source images increased the sensitivity to 100% for moderate and severe stenoses and to 100% for occluded vessels. In the visual inspection study, however, no statistically significant differences were found between interpretations of MIP images alone and those of MIP images in combination with source images. CONCLUSION: In the quantitative study, interpretation of source images rather than MIP images reduced the tendency to overestimate stenosis seen with MR angiography and improved the sensitivity for detecting stenosis of 50% or greater. There was a discrepancy between the quantitative study and visual inspection. Experienced observers had a tendency to underestimate the degree of stenosis.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F. Runck, R.P. Steiner, W.A. Bautz, and M.M. Lell
MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Technique and Postprocessing on Measurement of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1736 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.G. Choi, D.H. Lee, J.H. Lee, H.W. Pyun, D.W. Kang, S.U. Kwon, J.K. Kim, S.J. Kim, and D.C. Suh
Detection of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Steno-Occlusive Disease with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sensitivity Encoding at 3T
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 439 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R.I. Aviv, S.M. Benseler, G. DeVeber, E.D. Silverman, P.N. Tyrrell, L.M. Tsang, and D. Armstrong
Angiography of Primary Central Nervous System Angiitis of Childhood: Conventional Angiography versus Magnetic Resonance Angiography at Presentation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 9 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R.I. Aviv, S.M. Benseler, E.D. Silverman, P.N. Tyrrell, G. DeVeber, L.M. Tsang, and D. Armstrong
MR Imaging and Angiography of Primary CNS Vasculitis of Childhood
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 192 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. Cloft
Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Few Good Images?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 989 - 990.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Bash, J. P. Villablanca, R. Jahan, G. Duckwiler, M. Tillis, C. Kidwell, J. Saver, and J. Sayre
Intracranial Vascular Stenosis and Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1012 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Nagano, K. Maruoka, S. Uemura, and M. Takahashi
Prospective Evaluation of Suspected Stenoocclusive Disease of the Intracranial Artery: Combined MR Angiography and CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 93 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, P Humphrey, G Young, D Collie, and C P Warlow
How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 155 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. B. Grandin, G. Cosnard, F. Hammer, T. P. Duprez, G. Stroobandt, and P. Mathurin
Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Diagnosis with MR Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1611 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. M. Adams, R. D. Laitt, and A. Jackson
The Role of MR Angiography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparative Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1618 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
StrokeHome page
L. J. Lee, C. S. Kidwell, J. Alger, S. Starkman, and J. L. Saver
Impact on Stroke Subtype Diagnosis of Early Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Stroke, May 1, 2000; 31(5): 1081 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Skutta, Fürst, Eilers, Ferbert, and Kuhn
Intracranial Stenoocclusive Disease: Double-Detector Helical CT Angiography versus Digital Subtraction
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 1999; 20(5): 791 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text]