American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 1 135-143, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings
Y Korogi, M Takahashi, T Nakagawa, N Mabuchi, T Watabe, Y Shiokawa, H Shiga, T O'Uchi, H Miki, Y Horikawa, S Fujiwara and M Furuse
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University, School of Medicine, Japan.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether obtaining axial source images from three-dimensional Fourier transform (3DFT) time-of-flight MR angiography improves the detection of intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion if added to maximum-intensity projection (MIP) images. METHODS: The angiograms of 103 patients who had MR angiography for evaluation of possible intracranial vascular disease were reviewed retrospectively in a quantitative and nonquantitative fashion. Diameters of vessels on MR angiograms were measured quantitatively by two reviewers using a magnifying loupe and compared with the results from conventional angiograms. Degrees of stenoocclusive disease were categorized into five classes; an artery with stenosis of 50% or greater was considered to be diseased. Another five observers also reviewed the MIP images with and without source images in a blinded fashion by means of nonquantitative visual inspection. RESULTS: In all, 23 stenoocclusive lesions of 50% or greater were available for review. In the quantitative analysis, with MIP images alone, 14 (78%) of 18 moderate and severe stenoses and four (80%) of five occlusions were identified correctly. The addition of the source images increased the sensitivity to 100% for moderate and severe stenoses and to 100% for occluded vessels. In the visual inspection study, however, no statistically significant differences were found between interpretations of MIP images alone and those of MIP images in combination with source images. CONCLUSION: In the quantitative study, interpretation of source images rather than MIP images reduced the tendency to overestimate stenosis seen with MR angiography and improved the sensitivity for detecting stenosis of 50% or greater. There was a discrepancy between the quantitative study and visual inspection. Experienced observers had a tendency to underestimate the degree of stenosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Runck, R.P. Steiner, W.A. Bautz, and M.M. Lell MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Technique and Postprocessing on Measurement of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.G. Choi, D.H. Lee, J.H. Lee, H.W. Pyun, D.W. Kang, S.U. Kwon, J.K. Kim, S.J. Kim, and D.C. Suh Detection of Intracranial Atherosclerotic Steno-Occlusive Disease with 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography with Sensitivity Encoding at 3T AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 439 - 446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.I. Aviv, S.M. Benseler, G. DeVeber, E.D. Silverman, P.N. Tyrrell, L.M. Tsang, and D. Armstrong Angiography of Primary Central Nervous System Angiitis of Childhood: Conventional Angiography versus Magnetic Resonance Angiography at Presentation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 9 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.I. Aviv, S.M. Benseler, E.D. Silverman, P.N. Tyrrell, G. DeVeber, L.M. Tsang, and D. Armstrong MR Imaging and Angiography of Primary CNS Vasculitis of Childhood AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 192 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Cloft Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Few Good Images? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 989 - 990. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bash, J. P. Villablanca, R. Jahan, G. Duckwiler, M. Tillis, C. Kidwell, J. Saver, and J. Sayre Intracranial Vascular Stenosis and Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1012 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Nagano, K. Maruoka, S. Uemura, and M. Takahashi Prospective Evaluation of Suspected Stenoocclusive Disease of the Intracranial Artery: Combined MR Angiography and CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 93 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J M Wardlaw, S C Lewis, P Humphrey, G Young, D Collie, and C P Warlow How does the degree of carotid stenosis affect the accuracy and interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 2001; 71(2): 155 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Grandin, G. Cosnard, F. Hammer, T. P. Duprez, G. Stroobandt, and P. Mathurin Vasospasm after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Diagnosis with MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1611 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Adams, R. D. Laitt, and A. Jackson The Role of MR Angiography in the Pretreatment Assessment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparative Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1618 - 1628. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Lee, C. S. Kidwell, J. Alger, S. Starkman, and J. L. Saver Impact on Stroke Subtype Diagnosis of Early Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Stroke, May 1, 2000; 31(5): 1081 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Skutta, Fürst, Eilers, Ferbert, and Kuhn Intracranial Stenoocclusive Disease: Double-Detector Helical CT Angiography versus Digital Subtraction AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 1999; 20(5): 791 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||


