AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dix, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dix, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C. D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 3 409-415, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis

JE Dix, AJ Evans, DF Kallmes, AH Sobel and CD Phillips
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine optimal acquisition parameters and measurement techniques for CT angiography of the carotid bifurcation. METHODS: Anatomic phantoms were created in which the diameter of the carotid artery stenoses ranged from 15% to 95%. Initially, we compared the accuracy of stenosis determination obtained by using various values of section collimation and table pitch. Subsequently, applying the combination of collimation and pitch that yielded the greatest longitudinal coverage without degradation in accuracy, we compared the accuracy of measurements performed with various display algorithms, including axial, magnified axial, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and shaded surface display (SSD) images. Last, we determined the effect on accuracy of varying both window and level settings. The standard of reference for all measurements was considered to be caliper measurements made of the models at the time of their construction. RESULTS: CT angiography was highly accurate for determining the percentage of stenosis; the average difference between CT angiographic measurements and the standard of reference was less than 1% for all parameter combinations and measurement techniques. Precision varied among the measurement techniques. Magnified axial images provided more precise measurements than either the MIP or SSD images. Although there was a trend toward improved precision with the use of magnified versus unmagnified axial images and MIP versus SSD images, neither of these comparisons reached statistical significance. Systematic error was produced by changing the level setting from that halfway between the luminal density and vessel wall density. Random error was introduced by using window settings greater than zero. CONCLUSION: CT angiography was highly accurate and precise for determining percentage of stenosis. The highest precision was attained by using magnified axial images with the level halfway between luminal density and vessel wall density and with the window set to zero.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. J. Fox, S. P. Symons, R. I. Aviv, P. Howard, R. Yeung, and E. S. Bartlett
Should Modeling Methodology Suppress Anatomic Excellence?
Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3411 - 3412.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
M. R Jaff, G. V Goldmakher, M. H Lev, and J. M Romero
Imaging of the carotid arteries: the role of duplex ultrasonography, magnetic resonance arteriography, and computerized tomographic arteriography
Vascular Medicine, November 1, 2008; 13(4): 281 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. G. Vrachliotis, K. G. Bis, A. Haidary, R. Kosuri, M. Balasubramaniam, M. Gallagher, G. Raff, M. Ross, B. O'Neil, and W. O'Neill
Atypical Chest Pain: Coronary, Aortic, and Pulmonary Vasculature Enhancement at Biphasic Single-Injection 64-Section CT Angiography
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 368 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox
Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis
Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 632 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. R. Nandalur, E. Baskurt, K. D. Hagspiel, M. Finch, C. D. Phillips, S. R. Bollampally, and C. M. Kramer
Carotid Artery Calcification on CT May Independently Predict Stroke Risk
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 547 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox
Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 13 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.B. Ertl-Wagner, R. Bruening, J. Blume, R.-T. Hoffmann, S. Mueller-Schunk, B. Snyder, and M.F. Reiser
Relative Value of Sliding-Thin-Slab Multiplanar Reformations and Sliding-Thin-Slab Maximum Intensity Projections as Reformatting Techniques in Multisection CT Angiography of the Cervicocranial Vessels
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 107 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, and T. Kaminaga
Accuracy of Automated CT Angiography Measurement of Vascular Diameter in Phantoms: Effect of Size of Display Field of View, Density of Contrast Medium, and Wall Thickness
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1940 - 1944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y.-H. Kim, E. M. Marom, J. E. Herndon II, and H. P. McAdams
Pulmonary Vein Diameter, Cross-sectional Area, and Shape: CT Analysis
Radiology, April 1, 2005; 235(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. R. Nandalur, E. Baskurt, K. D. Hagspiel, C. D. Phillips, and C. M. Kramer
Calcified Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Is Associated Less with Ischemic Symptoms Than Is Noncalcified Plaque on MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 295 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Suzuki, S. Furui, T. Kaminaga, and T. Yamauchi
Measurement of Vascular Diameter In Vitro by Automated Software for CT Angiography: Effects of Inner Diameter, Density of Contrast Medium, and Convolution Kernel
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1313 - 1317.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. H. Lev, J. M. Romero, D. N.F. Goodman, R. Bagga, H. Y. K. Kim, N. A. Clerk, R. H. Ackerman, and R. G. Gonzalez
Total Occlusion versus Hairline Residual Lumen of the Internal Carotid Arteries: Accuracy of Single Section Helical CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1123 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. A. Addis, K. D. Hopper, T. A. Iyriboz, Y. Liu, S. W. Wise, C. J. Kasales, J. S. Blebea, and D. T. Mauger
CT Angiography: In Vitro Comparison of Five Reconstruction Methods
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 1171 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Porsche, L. Walker, D. Mendelow, and D. Birchall
Evaluation of Cross-Sectional Luminal Morphology in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease by Use of Spiral CT Angiography
Stroke, November 1, 2001; 32(11): 2511 - 2515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Liu, K. D. Hopper, D. T. Mauger, and K. A. Addis
CT Angiographic Measurement of the Carotid Artery: Optimizing Visualization by Manipulating Window and Level Settings and Contrast Material Attenuation
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 494 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. I. Grossman
BRAIN IMAGING
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2000; 21(1): 9 - 18.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. H. Lev, J. Farkas, J. J. Gemmete, S. T. Hossain, G. J. Hunter, W. J. Koroshetz, and R. G. Gonzalez
Acute Stroke: Improved Nonenhanced CT Detection-Benefits of Soft-Copy Interpretation by Using Variable Window Width and Center Level Settings
Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 150 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
X. Leclerc, O. Godefroy, C. Lucas, J.-F. Benhaim, T. S. Michel, D. Leys, and J. P. Pruvo
Internal Carotid Arterial Stenosis: CT Angiography with Volume Rendering
Radiology, March 1, 1999; 210(3): 673 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, Y. Murata, M. Takahashi, K. Suginohara, and S. Uemura
Maximum Stenosis of Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery: Effect of Luminal Morphology on Stenosis Measurement by Using CT Angiography and Conventional DSA
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 802 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]