AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakabayashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sugita, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakabayashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sugita, K.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 3 485-491, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Evaluation of particulate embolic materials with MR imaging, scanning electron microscopy, and phase-contrast microscopy

K Nakabayashi, M Negoro, T Handa, H Keino, M Takahashi and K Sugita
Department of Neurosurgery, Nagoya (Japan) University School of Medicine, Japan.

PURPOSE: To analyze the properties and embolic effect of microfibrillar collagen (MFC), Gelfoam powder, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) materials that are used in embolization procedures in the head and neck. METHODS: The shape and surface of these embolic agents were examined with scanning electron microscopy and phase-contrast microscopy. The mean number of areas of T2-weighted high signal intensity was measured on MR images in a rat embolization model to estimate the embolic effect. RESULTS: By scanning electron microscopy and phase-contrast microscopy, MFC appears fibriform and has various sizes and an irregular surface. Gelfoam is of uniform size and has a smooth surface. PVA materials are granulated and have a rough surface. MFC is somewhat suspendable and its shape changes moderately after suspension. Gelfoam is very suspendable and its shape changes rapidly. PVA showed only mild swelling. The embolic effect of MFC was the lowest of the materials examined. Large PVA particles (250 to 500 microns) showed a lesser embolic effect than Gelfoam or small PVA particles (50 to 150 microns) or medium-sized PVA particles (150 to 250 microns). No significant differences were observed among the embolic effects of Gelfoam, small PVA particles (50 to 150 microns), and medium PVA particles (150 to 250 microns). CONCLUSIONS: MFC and large PVA particles (250 to 500 microns) should be used for embolization of vascular anatomy involving potentially dangerous anastomoses. Gelfoam, PVA particles of 150- to 250-micron diameter, and PVA particles of 50- to 150-micron diameter are adequate for embolization involving homogeneous and peripheral anatomy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. S. Gomes, M. H. Rosove, P. J. Rosen, R. G. Amado, J. W. Sayre, P. A. Monteleone, and R. W. Busuttil
Triple-Drug Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Assessment of Survival in 124 Consecutive Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1665 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]