AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meyer, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Russell, E. J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 8 1515-1521, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Contrast-enhanced magnetization transfer MR of the brain: importance of precontrast images

JR Meyer, RW Androux, N Salamon, B Rabin, C Callahan, TB Parrish, J Prager and EJ Russell
Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill, USA.

PURPOSE: To determine the importance of obtaining precontrast T1- weighted magnetization transfer (MT) MR images for better interpretation contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MT images. METHODS: One hundred fifty-five patients referred for MR imaging of the brain were examined prospectively with noncontrast T1-weighted imaging, noncontrast T1-weighted imaging with MT, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging with MT. In the patients who had abnormally increased signal intensity on postcontrast images (with or without MT), the four imaging sequences were evaluated with regard to number of lesions and lesional signal intensity. For each of the sequences, two experienced neuroradiologists subjectively graded the lesions on a scale of 1 to 4 (4 being the most conspicuous) with regard to abnormally increased signal intensity. RESULTS: Twenty- two of the 155 patients had increased signal intensity on one or more of the postcontrast sequences. Eight of these 22 patients had increased signal intensity of one or more lesions on images without MT. All these lesions were seen better on images obtained with MT. An additional six of the 22 patients had increased signal intensity of one or more lesions on images obtained with MT that was not detected on images obtained without MT. Eight of the 22 patients had no high signal intensity on noncontrast images with or without MT. One of the eight had increased number and conspicuity of lesions on postcontrast MT images. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of patients had increased signal intensity on noncontrast T1-weighted images with MT that was not seen on noncontrast T1-weighted images without MT. This high signal intensity was also visible on postcontrast MT images, and would have been mistaken for pathologic enhancement if noncontrast MT images had not been available for comparison.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
P Kamra, R Azad, K N Prasad, S Jha, S Pradhan, and R K Gupta
Infectious meningitis: prospective evaluation with magnetization transfer MRI
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2004; 77(917): 387 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Gupta, M. Kathuria, and Pradhan
Magnetization Transfer MR Imaging in CNS
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 1999; 20(5): 867 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text]