AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fellner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fellner, F.
Right arrow Articles by Schmitt, R.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 9 1617-1625, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Comparison of spin-echo MR pulse sequences for imaging of the brain

F Fellner, C Fellner, P Held and R Schmitt
Department of Neuroradiology, Oberosterreichische Landesnervenklinik, Linz, Austria.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of the gradient- and spin-echo (GRASE) technique as compared with the fast spin-echo and conventional spin- echo techniques in MR imaging of the brain. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with ischemic and neoplastic brain lesions were examined with T2- weighted spin-echo, fast spin-echo, and GRASE sequences. Three independent observers evaluated the contrast characteristics of anatomic and pathologic structures and of artifacts. Quantitative image analysis included region-of-interest measurements of anatomic structures and lesions. RESULTS: The contrast of anatomic structures was superior in images obtained with conventional and fast spin-echo techniques as compared with those obtained with the GRASE technique. Extended lesions, such as tumors and territorial infarcts, were identified equally with all techniques. For delineation of small ischemic lesions, GRASE was slightly inferior to fast and conventional spin-echo sequences. Flow artifacts were considerably reduced with fast spin-echo and GRASE sequences. Chemical-shift artifacts were significantly reduced, but ringing artifacts were more pronounced with GRASE. CONCLUSION: Fast spin-echo remains the standard technique in MR imaging of the brain. However, GRASE might be useful in special cases, such as with uncooperative patients whose conventional or fast spin- echo images show severe motion artifacts.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
N. J. Beauchamp Jr, P. B. Barker, P. Y. Wang, and P. C. M. vanZijl
Imaging of Acute Cerebral Ischemia
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 307 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text]