AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rand, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Krouwer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rand, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Krouwer, H.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 18, Issue 9 1695-1704, Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Accuracy of single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy in distinguishing neoplastic from nonneoplastic brain lesions

SD Rand, R Prost, V Haughton, L Mark, J Strainer, J Johansen, TA Kim, VK Chetty, W Mueller, G Meyer and H Krouwer
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee 53226, USA.

PURPOSE: To measure the accuracy of single-voxel, image-guided proton MR spectroscopy in distinguishing normal from abnormal brain tissue and neoplastic from nonneoplastic brain disease. METHODS: MR spectroscopy was performed at 0.5 T with the point-resolved spectroscopic pulse sequence and conventional postprocessing techniques. Subjects consisted of a consecutive series of patients with suspected brain neoplasms or recurrent neoplasia and 10 healthy adult volunteers. Fifty-five lesions in 53 patients with subsequently verified final diagnoses were included. Spectra were interpreted qualitatively by visual inspection by nonblinded readers (prospectively) with the benefit of prior clinical data and imaging studies, and by blinded readers (retrospectively). The nonblinded readers interpreted the spectra as diagnostic or not, and, if diagnostic, as neoplastic or nonneoplastic. The blinded readers classified the spectra as diagnostic or not, and, if diagnostic, as normal or abnormal and as neoplastic or nonneoplastic (when abnormal). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy were calculated from blinded and nonblinded MR spectroscopy interpretations. A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed on blinded MR spectroscopy interpretations. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy averaged across four blinded readers in differentiating patients from control subjects was .96, while the area under the aggregate (pooled interpretations) ROC curve approached unity. Accuracy in the nonblinded and blinded discrimination of neoplastic from nonneoplastic disease was .96 and .83, respectively. The area under the aggregate ROC curve in the blinded discrimination of neoplasm from nonneoplasm was .89. CONCLUSIONS: Image-guided proton spectra obtained at 0.5 T from patients with suspected neoplasia can be distinguished from spectra in healthy control subjects, and neoplastic spectra can be distinguished from nonneoplastic spectra with a high degree of diagnostic accuracy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C. Majos, C. Aguilera, J. Alonso, M. Julia-Sape, S. Castaner, J.J. Sanchez, A. Samitier, A. Leon, A. Rovira, and C. Arus
Proton MR Spectroscopy Improves Discrimination between Tumor and Pseudotumoral Lesion in Solid Brain Masses
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 544 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Hourani, L.J. Brant, T. Rizk, J.D. Weingart, P.B. Barker, and A. Horska
Can Proton MR Spectroscopic and Perfusion Imaging Differentiate Between Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Brain Lesions in Adults?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 366 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. F. Faria, S. M. Goldman, J. Szejnfeld, H. Melo, C. Kater, P. Kenney, M. P. Huayllas, G. Demarchi, V. V. Francisco, C. Andreoni, et al.
Adrenal Masses: Characterization with in Vivo Proton MR Spectroscopy Initial Experience
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 788 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Al-Okaili, J. Krejza, J. H. Woo, R. L. Wolf, D. M. O'Rourke, K. D. Judy, H. Poptani, and E. R. Melhem
Intraaxial Brain Masses: MR Imaging-based Diagnostic Strategy--Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 539 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. Hollingworth, L.S. Medina, R.E. Lenkinski, D.K. Shibata, B. Bernal, D. Zurakowski, B. Comstock, and J.G. Jarvik
A Systematic Literature Review of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for the Characterization of Brain Tumors
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1404 - 1411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C.-K. Wang, C.-W. Li, T.-J. Hsieh, S.-H. Chien, G.-C. Liu, and K.-B. Tsai
Characterization of Bone and Soft-Tissue Tumors with in Vivo 1H MR Spectroscopy: Initial Results
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 599 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Law, S. Yang, H. Wang, J. S. Babb, G. Johnson, S. Cha, E. A. Knopp, and D. Zagzag
Glioma Grading: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values of Perfusion MR Imaging and Proton MR Spectroscopic Imaging Compared with Conventional MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 1989 - 1998.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
D J A Butteriss, A Ismail, D W Ellison, and D Birchall
Use of serial proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to differentiate low grade glioma from tumefactive plaque in a patient with multiple sclerosis
Br. J. Radiol., September 1, 2003; 76(909): 662 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
N. Bulakbasi, M. Kocaoglu, F. Ors, C. Tayfun, and T. Ucoz
Combination of Single-Voxel Proton MR Spectroscopy and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Calculation in the Evaluation of Common Brain Tumors
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2003; 24(2): 225 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.-P. Schlemmer, P. Bachert, K. K. Herfarth, I. Zuna, J. Debus, and G. van Kaick
Proton MR Spectroscopic Evaluation of Suspicious Brain Lesions After Stereotactic Radiotherapy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2001; 22(7): 1316 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. R. Maheshwari, S. K. Mukherji, B. Neelon, S. Schiro, G. M. Fatterpekar, J. A. Stone, and M. Castillo
The Choline/Creatine Ratio in Five Benign Neoplasms: Comparison with Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Use of in Vitro MR Spectroscopy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2000; 21(10): 1930 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. W. Haley, W. W. Marshall, G. G. McDonald, M. A. Daugherty, F. Petty, and J. L. Fleckenstein
Brain Abnormalities in Gulf War Syndrome: Evaluation with
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 807 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P. E. Ricci, A. Pitt, P. J. Keller, S. W. Coons, and J. E. Heiserman
Effect of Voxel Position on Single-Voxel MR Spectroscopy Findings
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2000; 21(2): 367 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Majós, Cucurella, Aguilera, Coll, and L. Pons
Intraventricular Meningiomas: MR Imaging and MR Spectroscopic Findings in Two
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 1999; 20(5): 882 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. E. Meyerand, J. M. Pipas, A. Mamourian, T. D. Tosteson, and J. F. Dunn
Classification of Biopsy-Confirmed Brain Tumors Using Single-Voxel MR Spectroscopy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 1999; 20(1): 117 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text]