AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Komiyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yasui, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Komiyama, M.
Right arrow Articles by Yasui, T.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 1 45-49, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Middle cerebral artery variations: duplicated and accessory arteries

M Komiyama, H Nakajima, M Nishikawa and T Yasui
Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City General Hospital, Miyakojima, Osaka, Japan.

PURPOSE: Our goal was to analyze the anatomic similarity between the duplicated middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the accessory MCA and their relationship to the early branches of the MCA. METHODS: We reviewed stereoscopic angiograms of duplicated MCAs in four patients and accessory MCAs in four patients with reference to the origin, size, and cortical supply of these anomalous vessels, along with the presence of perforating arteries and the recurrent artery of Heubner (RAH). RESULTS: The duplicated MCAs supplied the cortical territory of the temporopolar and the anterior temporal and/or middle temporal arteries. The accessory MCAs supplied the cortical territory of the orbitofrontal and/or prefrontal arteries. The duplicated MCAs had perforating arteries in three of four cases and coexisted with the RAH in three of four cases, whereas the main MCA had perforating arteries in all four cases. The accessory MCA had perforating arteries in all four cases and coexisted with the RAH in three of four cases, whereas the main MCA had perforating arteries in one of four cases. CONCLUSION: A consistent cortical supply by the duplicated MCA and the accessory MCA to the anterior temporal lobe and the anterior frontal lobe, respectively, and its similarity to the cortical supply by the early branches of the MCA suggest that development of duplicated and/or accessory MCAs is an anomalously early ramification of the early branches of the MCA.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M KOMIYAMA and T YASUI
Accessory middle cerebral artery and moyamoya disease
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2001; 71(1): 129 - 130.
[Full Text] [PDF]