American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 2 253-259, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR
T Hirai, Y Korogi, S Hamatake, I Ikushima, T Sugahara, Y Sigematsu, Y Higashida and M Takahashi
Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Honjo, Japan.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the value of three- dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR sequences relative to contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR imaging in the diagnosis of carotid cavernous fistula (CCF). METHODS: Seventeen patients with 19 angiographically proved CCFs had contrast-enhanced CT, spin-echo MR imaging, and 3-D FISP imaging. Three observers assessed these imaging studies as well as those of 43 control sides in a blinded manner for the presence or absence of CCF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the diagnostic utility of each imaging technique. In a nonblinded study, contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images were also evaluated. RESULTS: Higher diagnostic accuracy was obtained with 3-D FISP sequences, as the shunt flow within the cavernous sinus was well seen. Sensitivity of 3-D FISP images was 83% and specificity was 100% in the blinded study. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the diagnostic performance of observers was found to be better with the 3-D FISP images than with the spin-echo MR images. Although there were no significant difference between 3-D FISP and contrast-enhanced CT, higher diagnostic performance was obtained with 3-D FISP images. In three CCFs without anterior drainage, a diagnosis was made only from the 3-D FISP images. The contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images were not helpful, since the cavernous sinuses enhanced. CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional FISP imaging is superior to spin-echo MR imaging and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of CCF. Contrast-enhanced 3-D FISP images are not helpful for the evaluation of CCF.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A.A.K. A. Razek and M. Castillo Imaging Lesions of the Cavernous Sinus AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 444 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Akiba, M. Tamakawa, H. Hyodoh, K. Hyodoh, N. Yama, T. Nonaka, Y. Minamida, M. Hashimoto, and M. Hareyama Assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas of the Cavernous Sinuses on 3D Dynamic MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1652 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. C.-C. Chen, P. C.-T. Chang, C.-G. Shy, W.-S. Chen, and H.-C. Hung CT Angiography and MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Carotid Cavernous Sinus Fistula Prior to Embolization: A Comparison of Techniques AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2349 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kitajima, T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, M. Yamura, K. Kawanaka, I. Ikushima, Y. Hayashida, Y. Yamashita, and J. Kuratsu Retrograde Cortical and Deep Venous Drainage in Patients with Intracranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Comparison of MR Imaging and Angiographic Findings AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1532 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J C Rucker, V Biousse, and N J Newman Magnetic resonance angiography source images in carotid cavernous fistulas Br J Ophthalmol, February 1, 2004; 88(2): 311 - 311. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Paksoy, B. O. Genc, and E. Genc Retrograde Flow in the Left Inferior Petrosal Sinus and Blood Steal of the Cavernous Sinus Associated with Central Vein Stenosis: MR Angiographic Findings AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2003; 24(7): 1364 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Ouanounou, T. A. Tomsick, C. Heitsman, and C. K. Holland Cavernous Sinus and Inferior Petrosal Sinus Flow Signal on Three-Dimensional Time-of-Flight MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 1999; 20(8): 1476 - 1481. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|