American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 2 309-315, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLES |
MR angiographic and sonographic indications for endarterectomy
J Huston, DA Nichols, PH Luetmer, CH Rydberg, BD Lewis, FB Meyer, RD Brown and CD Schleck
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, 55950, USA.
PURPOSE: Our objective was to determine whether appropriate criteria could be developed for performing an endarterectomy on the basis of sonographic and MR angiographic findings. METHODS: Fifty patients were examined prospectively with sonography, MR angiography, and conventional angiography. All three imaging studies were performed within 2 weeks of one another, and conventional angiography served as the reference standard. RESULTS: All 10 carotid occlusions were detected with sonography and MR angiography. Sonography accurately showed flow in two arteries, and MR angiography showed flow in one of three nearly occluded arteries with extremely slow flow. Multislab three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiographic sequences underestimated the degree of stenosis in 12 arteries, and in two cases this resulted from high T1 signal within the atherosclerotic plaque. With conventional angiography as the reference standard for 70% to 99% stenosis, sonography had a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 91%, and a positive predictive value of 90%, while concordant sonographic findings and the presence of a signal void on multislab 3-D time-of- flight sequences had a sensitivity of 72%, a specificity of 98%, and a positive predictive value of 97%. CONCLUSION: Endarterectomy performed on the basis of sonographic findings of 70% to 99% stenosis and of a signal void on multislab 3-D time-of-flight MR angiographic sequences is appropriate.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. M. Debrey, H. Yu, J. K. Lynch, K.-O. Lovblad, V. L. Wright, S.-J. D. Janket, and A. E. Baird Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Internal Carotid Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Stroke, August 1, 2008; 39(8): 2237 - 2248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. F. Layton, J. Huston 3rd, H. J. Cloft, T. J. Kaufmann, K. N. Krecke, and D. F. Kallmes Specificity of MR Angiography as a Confirmatory Test for Carotid Artery Stenosis: Is It Valid? Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 1114 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. K. DeMarco, J. Huston III, and M. A. Bernstein Evaluation of Classic 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in the Depiction of Severe Carotid Stenosis Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2004; 183(3): 787 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. H. Wierks and N. Labropoulos Noninvasive Carotid Imaging Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, June 1, 2004; 16(2): 89 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Ecker, M. A. Pichelmann, I. Meissner, and F. B. Meyer Durability of Carotid Endarterectomy Stroke, December 1, 2003; 34(12): 2941 - 2944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. J. Nederkoorn, Y. van der Graaf, B. C. Eikelboom, A. van der Lugt, L. W. Bartels, and W. P.T.M. Mali Time-of-Flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2002; 23(10): 1779 - 1784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C.C. Johnston, MD;, K. M. Chapman, MD;, and L. B. Goldstein, MD Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice Neurology, December 11, 2001; 57(11): 2012 - 2014. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Phan, J. Huston III, M. A. Bernstein, S. J. Riederer, and R. D. Brown Jr Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Cervical Vessels: Experience With 422 Patients Stroke, October 1, 2001; 32(10): 2282 - 2286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C.C. Johnston and L. B. Goldstein Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography Neurology, April 24, 2001; 56(8): 1009 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. H. III, S. B. Fain, J. T. Wald, P. H. Luetmer, C. H. Rydberg, D. J. Covarrubias, S. J. Riederer, M. A. Bernstein, R. D. Brown, F. B. Meyer, et al. Carotid Artery: Elliptic Centric Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography Compared with Conventional Angiography Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 138 - 143. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Serfaty, P. Chirossel, J. M. Chevallier, R. Ecochard, J. C. Froment, and P. C. Douek Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Gadolinium-Enhanced MR Angiography in the Assessment of Extracranial Carotid Artery Disease Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2000; 175(2): 455 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. T. Rasanen, H. I. Manninen, R. L. Vanninen, P. Vainio, M. Berg, and T. Saari Mild Carotid Artery Atherosclerosis : Assessment by 3-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography, With Reference to Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging and Contrast Angiography Stroke, April 1, 1999; 30(4): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. III, S. B. Fain, S. J. Riederer, A. H. Wilman, M. A. Bernstein, and R. F. Busse Carotid Arteries: Maximizing Arterial to Venous Contrast in Fluoroscopically Triggered Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography with Elliptic Centric View Ordering Radiology, April 1, 1999; 211(1): 265 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|