AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kaneda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohba, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kaneda, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ohba, S.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 2 317-319, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Dental bur fragments causing metal artifacts on MR images

T Kaneda, M Minami, HD Curtin, T Utsunomiya, I Shirouzu, M Yamashiro, H Kiba, H Yamamoto and S Ohba
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to define the role of dental bur fragments in producing metal artifacts on MR images. METHODS: Dental prosthetic reconstructions were made for two dogs. The two lower second premolars were prepared for full-cast crowns by using a diamond bur. The crown margin was placed subgingivally on the right side (1 mm below the free gingival margin) and at the same level as the free gingival margin on the left side. After 1 week, full-cast crowns were cemented in place. MR imaging was performed 7 days later. RESULTS: Metal artifacts appeared in both second premolar regions of the mandible on MR images, with the right side, in which the crown margin was positioned subgingivally, displaying a larger signal distortion than the left side. After removal of the crown, the artifact remained on the right. On histopathologic examination, bur fragments were detected in the gingiva, more on the right than on the left. X-ray fluorescent element analysis showed iron in the gingival tissue containing bur fragments. CONCLUSION: Distortion of MR images was considered to be attributable in part to the damage of the gingiva and in part to the presence of dental bur fragments.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch DermatolHome page
Submucosal Nodule of the Tongue--Diagnosis
Arch Dermatol, March 1, 2006; 142(3): 385 - 390.
[Full Text] [PDF]