AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medina, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medina, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, P. D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 3 529-534, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Efficacy of fast screening MR in children and adolescents with suspected intracranial tumors

LS Medina, D Zurakowski, KR Strife, RL Robertson, TY Poussaint and PD Barnes
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of a fast screening MR protocol in children and adolescents with suspected intracranial tumors. METHODS: One hundred forty-one patients (mean age, 9.7 years; range, 2 months to 23.5 years) with suspected brain tumor were entered in a case-control study. Eighty-seven patients had intracranial tumors (31 suprasellar/hypothalamic, 27 supratentorial, 26 infratentorial, and three pineal) and 54 patients in the control group had other disorders. Two neuroradiologists reviewed blindly a detailed three-sequence conventional protocol (acquisition time, 8 minutes 27 seconds) and a two-sequence fast screening MR protocol (acquisition time, 4 minutes 44 seconds). RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of the fast screening protocol for intracranial tumors was 100% and 92.6%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.966 for the fast screening and 0.980 for the conventional MR protocol. No diagnostic performance difference was found between the ROC curves using the Az index. A kappa statistic of .93 for both examinations indicated excellent interobserver agreement. Additional MR sequences and other neuroimaging studies were not deemed necessary to exclude the presence of an intracranial tumor. CONCLUSION: A fast dual-plane brain MR protocol may be adequate to screen children and adolescents thought to have an intracranial tumor. The less than 5 minute acquisition time allows a complete examination (including preparation) to be performed in 10 to 15 minutes. Future studies are recommended before this time-efficient neuroimaging examination is incorporated into clinical practice.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. J. Khanna, T. R. Yoon, M. A. Mont, D. S. Hungerford, and D. A. Bluemke
Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Detection and Grading by Using a Rapid MR Imaging Protocol
Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 188 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text]