AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casey, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Truwit, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casey, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Truwit, C. L.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 8 1513-1521, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Integral and shell-MIP display algorithms in MR and CT three- dimensional models of the brain surface

SO Casey, D Rubinstein, KO Lillehei, RA Alberico, RR Ozsvath, AG Cajade-Law, BE Weprin, E Michel and CL Truwit
Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis 55455, USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to demonstrate the use of integral and shell maximum intensity projection (shell-MIP) display algorithms in the 3-D CT and MR depiction of cerebral gyral and surface venous anatomy and disorders. These new algorithms are compared against MIP and shaded-surface-display (SSD) algorithms. METHODS: Integral and shell-MIP displays were generated from a specified number of proximal surface voxel layers in a 3-D model. Algorithmic models were compared on nine contrast-enhanced spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in a steady state (SPGR) MR venograms for brain surface anatomic identification and detail. Seven CT venograms were compared for conspicuity of filling defects. Twelve contrast-enhanced preoperative planning 3-D MR models were rated for neurosurgical utility. RESULTS: A shell-MIP score of 7.00 and an integral score of 6.78 represented the highest mean subjective MR gyral quality (1-10 scale) followed by an SSD score of 3.89 and an MIP score of 1.06. Mean confidence scores for MR central sulcus identification (1-10 scale) were shell-MIP, 7.67; integral, 7.00; SSD, 3.22; and MIP, 1.00. Mean superficial venous quality MR ratings (1-10 scale) were shell-MIP, 8.22; MIP, 7.39; integral, 7.00; and SSD, 3.72. The mean number of cortical veins draining into each side of the superior sagittal sinus on MR was as follows: MIP, 6.19; integral, 6.06; shell-MIP, 5.94; and SSD, 3.81. Mean confidence scores for filling defect identification on CT venograms (1-5 scale) revealed a shell-MIP score of 4.36 and an integral score of 4.29 to be superior to a MIP score of 3.00. In selected cases, 3-D presurgical planning, prior to tumor resection, was clinically useful. CONCLUSION: Integral and shell-MIP are useful 3-D display algorithms for simultaneous display of superficial cerebral veins and gyri on MR images and of thrombosis on CT venograms.