AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pelz, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pelz, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, A. J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 8 1541-1547, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Thromboembolic events associated with the treatment of cerebral aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils

DM Pelz, SP Lownie and AJ Fox
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to document the prevalence, radiologic appearance, and treatment of thromboembolic events related to GDC embolization of cerebral aneurysms. METHODS: The clinical and radiologic records of all patients undergoing GDC treatment of intracranial aneurysms at our institution were reviewed. All cases in which unexpected complications occurred were selected. Those complications related to presumed thromboembolic events were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 59 patients (60 aneurysms) treated with GDCs, 17 (28%) experienced thromboembolic events. Seven patients had transient ischemic attacks and 10 had strokes. In 10 patients, the deficits occurred during or immediately after the procedure; in the rest, the complications were delayed. In six patients, all radiologic investigations were negative for infarction and in seven patients, CT scans showed new ischemic lesions. In four patients, MR imaging alone showed infarcts, and in four of nine patients who underwent subsequent angiography, acute ischemic findings were demonstrated. Eight patients were treated with volume expansion, eight with full heparinization, and one patient underwent intraarterial thrombolysis. Clinical outcome was excellent or good in 14 of 17 patients, with only three patients (5%) incurring permanent neurologic deficits. CONCLUSION: Thromboembolic events related to GDC treatment may be more common than has been reported in the literature. In our experience, this rate was 28%, with persisting deficits in 5%. These events can occur after uncomplicated procedures and may be unaccompanied by radiologic findings. Clinical outcome is usually favorable.