AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zoarski, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hebel, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zoarski, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hebel, J. R.

American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol 19, Issue 8 1571-1576, Copyright © 1998 by American Society of Neuroradiology


ARTICLES

Performance characteristics of microcatheter systems in a standardized tortuous pathway

GH Zoarski, JM Mathis and JR Hebel
Department of Radiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore 21201, USA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Published reports of controlled experiments designed to evaluate the performance of over-the-wire microcatheter systems are rare and have often been based on subjective impressions from small clinical series. This investigation was designed to compare the load forces required to propel state-of-the-art, hydrophilically coated microcatheters from each of four manufacturers through a standardized tortuous pathway constructed of polytetrafluoroethylene tubing. METHODS: Currently available hydrophilically coated microcatheters were provided by four manufacturers. A 20-cm long, three- dimensional pathway simulating the intracranial carotid circulation was constructed of 0.065-in. (inner diameter) polytetrafluoroethylene tubing and immersed in a water bath at 37 degrees C. Testing was performed using an Instron tabletop load frame fitted with a 2-lb load cell. Durability and load force tests were conducted using a 0.014-in. stainless steel noncoated guidewire, with the wire tip protruding 1 cm beyond the catheter tip. At least four samples of microcatheters from each manufacturer were tested. RESULTS: Extensive trackability testing of the guidewire alone established reproducible performance with maximum load forces of less than 8 g. Maximum gram forces for the four reinforced microcatheters were not greatly different, measuring between 9 and 14 g. Excessive buckling of the only nonreinforced catheter was initially overcome early in the pathway in a staccato, stepwise fashion. After reaching a critical load, however, the catheter and guidewire prolapsed. CONCLUSION: All reinforced microcatheters tested established good and reproducible performance in our model. Reinforced microcatheters provided superior trackability over the one nonreinforced device tested.