Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Filippi, M. Articles by Comi, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Filippi, M. Articles by Comi, G.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 20:133-137 (1 1999)
© 1999 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Interscanner Variation in Brain MR Lesion Load Measurements in Multiple Sclerosis Using Conventional Spin-Echo, Rapid Relaxation-Enhanced, and Fast-FLAIR Sequences

Massimo Filippi^,a, Maria A. Rocca^a, Claudio Gasperini^a, Maria P. Sormani^a, Stefano Bastianello^a, Mark A. Horsfield^a, Carlo Pozzilli^a and Giancarlo Comi^a

^a From the Neuroimaging Research Unit (M.F., M.A.R., M.P.S.) and Clinical Trials Unit (G.C.), Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, University of Milan; Departments of Neurology (C.G., C.P.) and Neuroradiology (S.B.), Università "La Sapienza," Rome; Department of Neurology (C.G.), San Camillo Hospital, Rome; Unit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trials (M.P.S.), Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy; and Division of Medical Physics (M.A.H.), University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different MR pulse sequences have been proposed for measuring multiple sclerosis (MS)-related abnormalities. The reproducibility of measured brain MS lesion volumes was compared for MR images performed using different scanners and different pulse sequences.

METHODS: Nine patients with relapsing-remitting MS were each imaged on two scanners and, on each occasion, dual-echo conventional spin-echo, dual-echo rapid-acquisition relaxation-enhanced (RARE), and fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (fast-FLAIR) images were obtained. The lesion volume present on each image was evaluated three times by a single observer in random order, using a local thresholding technique.

RESULTS: The mean lesion volumes present on fast-FLAIR images were significantly higher than those measured on dual-echo conventional spin-echo and RARE images. The mean intraobserver coefficients of variation for the different sequences and scanners ranged from 3.0% to 4.2% (no statistically significant difference). For each of the sequences, the use of different scanners introduced a variability that was higher than the intraobserver variability: the interscanner coefficient of variation was 7.4% for conventional spin-echo, 9.5% for RARE, and 18.5% for fast-FLAIR images.

CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the use of different scanners significantly influences lesion loads measured from MR images of patients with MS and establishes that newer sequences are more susceptible to measurement variability. It also indicates that, if newer sequences are to be used in clinical trials, careful standardization is needed.