AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Right arrow Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Skutta,
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn,

ARTICLE

Intracranial Stenoocclusive Disease: Double-Detector Helical CT Angiography versus Digital Subtraction Angiography

Bernd Skuttaa, Günter Fürsta, Jan Eilersa, Andreas Ferberta and Fritz-Peter Kuhn,a

a From the Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (B.S., J.E., F.-P.K.) and the Department of Neurology (A.F.), Klinikum Kassel Kassel, Germany, and the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology (G.F.), Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To our knowledge, no large-scale studies comparing the accuracy of CT angiography (CTA) to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of intracranial stenosis have been reported. We attempted to determine the diagnostic value of intracranial CT angiography (CTA) of normal vasculature and variants as well as of stenoocclusive disease.

METHODS: One-hundred and twelve patients underwent CTA and intraarterial angiography, and 2205 vascular segments were examined to ascertain presence, visibility, and degree of arterial stenoses (n = 105) as well as anatomic variants. Source, maximum intensity projection (MIP), and MIP-generated multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images were evaluated.

RESULTS: All 55 anatomic variants were identified correctly. Visibility of small-vessel segments was increased from 75% to 83% by using source images. MPR was helpful in differentiating distal vertebral hypoplasia from stenosis and in overcoming artifacts. All 43 occlusive segments were graded correctly (sensitivity = 100%, predictive value = 93.4%) as follows: severely stenotic ([n = 23], sensitivity = 78%, predictive value = 81.8%); moderately stenotic ([n = 36], sensitivity = 61%, predictive value = 84.6%); and mildly stenotic ([n = 3], sensitivity = 66%, predictive value = 28%). Normal segments (n = 2100) had a sensitivity of 99.5%, and CTA evinced a specificity of 99% for detecting stenoocclusive disease. Approximately one-third of wrong assessments were related to the petrous segment of the carotid artery.

CONCLUSION: CTA with double-detector technology and advanced postprocessing algorithms, including MPR, is about as reliable as MRA in depicting the vasculature of the anterior and posterior circulation and in grading intracranial stenoocclusive lesions, with the exception of the petrous segment of the carotid artery. CTA might be superior to MRA in the evaluation of poststenotic low-flow segments.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. E. Latchaw, M. J. Alberts, M. H. Lev, J. J. Connors, R. E. Harbaugh, R. T. Higashida, R. Hobson, C. S. Kidwell, W. J. Koroshetz, V. Mathews, et al.
Recommendations for Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3646 - 3678.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.Y. Yoon, S.K. Chang, C.S. Choi, W.-K. Kim, and J.-H. Lee
Multidetector Row CT Angiography in Spontaneous Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Prospective Comparison with Conventional Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2009; 30(5): 962 - 967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C. Balucani, D. Leys, E. B. Ringelstein, M. Kaste, W. Hacke, and for the Executive Committee of the European Stroke
Detection of Intracranial Atherosclerosis: Which Imaging Techniques Are Available in European Hospitals?
Stroke, March 1, 2009; 40(3): 726 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. K. Sharma, G. Tsivgoulis, A. Y. Lao, M. D. Malkoff, and A. V. Alexandrov
Noninvasive Detection of Diffuse Intracranial Disease
Stroke, December 1, 2007; 38(12): 3175 - 3181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Khan, G C Cloud, S Kerry, and H S Markus
Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: a systematic review
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2007; 78(11): 1218 - 1225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Tsivgoulis, V. K. Sharma, A. Y. Lao, M. D. Malkoff, and A. V. Alexandrov
Validation of Transcranial Doppler With Computed Tomography Angiography in Acute Cerebral Ischemia
Stroke, April 1, 2007; 38(4): 1245 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. P. Villablanca, F. J. Rodriguez, T. Stockman, S. Dahliwal, M. Omura, S. Hazany, and J. Sayre
MDCT Angiography for Detection and Quantification of Small Intracranial Arteries: Comparison with Conventional Catheter Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 593 - 602.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Lell, C. Fellner, U. Baum, T. Hothorn, R. Steiner, W. Lang, W. Bautz, and F.A. Fellner
Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis with Multisection CT and MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Modality and Postprocessing
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 104 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
V. Hachinski, C. Iadecola, R. C. Petersen, M. M. Breteler, D. L. Nyenhuis, S. E. Black, W. J. Powers, C. DeCarli, J. G. Merino, R. N. Kalaria, et al.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network Vascular Cognitive Impairment Harmonization Standards
Stroke, September 1, 2006; 37(9): 2220 - 2241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. J. Alberts, R. E. Latchaw, W. R. Selman, T. Shephard, M. N. Hadley, L. M. Brass, W. Koroshetz, J. R. Marler, J. Booss, R. D. Zorowitz, et al.
Recommendations for Comprehensive Stroke Centers: A Consensus Statement From the Brain Attack Coalition
Stroke, July 1, 2005; 36(7): 1597 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Bash, J. P. Villablanca, R. Jahan, G. Duckwiler, M. Tillis, C. Kidwell, J. Saver, and J. Sayre
Intracranial Vascular Stenosis and Occlusive Disease: Evaluation with CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1012 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Fiehler, K. Knudsen, G. Thomalla, E. Goebell, M. Rosenkranz, C. Weiller, J. Rother, H. Zeumer, and T. Kucinski
Vascular Occlusion Sites Determine Differences in Lesion Growth from Early Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Lesion to Final Infarct
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1056 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. T. Walker, A. Wattamwar, D. Mellman, and J. Mo
Active Hemorrhage into a Postresection Cavity Detected by Neuro-CT Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1163 - 1165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. P. Kloska, D. G. Nabavi, C. Gaus, E.-M. Nam, E. Klotz, E. B. Ringelstein, and W. Heindel
Acute Stroke Assessment with CT: Do We Need Multimodal Evaluation?
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 79 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
K. D. Flemming, R. D. Brown Jr, G. W. Petty, J. Huston III, D. F. Kallmes, and D. G. Piepgras
Evaluation and Management of Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Cerebral Infarction
Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2004; 79(8): 1071 - 1086.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. L. Martin, K. H. Tay, B. Flak, P. D. Fry, D. L. Doyle, D. C. Taylor, Y. N. Hsiang, and L. S. Machan
Multidetector CT Angiography of the Aortoiliac System and Lower Extremities: A Prospective Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1085 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
N. C. Suwanwela, K. Phanthumchinda, and N. Suwanwela
Transcranial Doppler Sonography and CT Angiography in Patients with Atherothrombotic Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2002; 23(8): 1352 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. A. Ezzeddine, M. H. Lev, C. T. McDonald, G. Rordorf, J. Oliveira-Filho, F. G. Aksoy, J. Farkas, A. Z. Segal, L. H. Schwamm, R. G. Gonzalez, et al.
CT Angiography With Whole Brain Perfused Blood Volume Imaging: Added Clinical Value in the Assessment of Acute Stroke
Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 959 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. Hirai, Y. Korogi, K. Ono, M. Nagano, K. Maruoka, S. Uemura, and M. Takahashi
Prospective Evaluation of Suspected Stenoocclusive Disease of the Intracranial Artery: Combined MR Angiography and CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 93 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. W. Venema, F. J. H. Hulsmans, and G. J. den Heeten
CT Angiography of the Circle of Willis and Intracranial Internal Carotid Arteries: Maximum Intensity Projection with Matched Mask Bone Elimination--Feasibility Study
Radiology, March 1, 2001; 218(3): 893 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text]