AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fein,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanabe, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fein,

ARTICLE

Magnetization Transfer Ratio of White Matter Hyperintensities in Subcortical Ischemic Vascular Dementia

Jody L. Tanabea, Frank Ezekiela, William J. Jagusta, Bruce R. Reeda, David Normana, Norbert Schuffa, Michael W. Weinera, Helena Chuia and George Fein,a

a From the Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, New York (J.L.T.); Psychiatry Research (F.E., G.F.) and Magnetic Resonance Unit (N.S., M.W.W.), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA; the Departments of Radiology (D.N., N.S., M.W.W.) and Psychiatry (M.W.W., G.F.), University of California, San Francisco; the Center for Functional Imaging, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (W.J.J.) and the Department of Neurology (W.J.J., B.R.R.), University of California, Davis; and the Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (H.C.).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In subjects with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD), tissue vacuolization, myelin pallor, and demyelination have been found on pathologic examination of white matter signal hyperintensities (WMSH). Magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) values provide a potential measure of compromised white matter integrity. The purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in MTR of WMSH between subjects with SIVD and cognitively normal healthy control subjects.

METHODS: Fifteen subjects with SIVD and 16 control subjects of comparable age and sex were studied. MTR images were coregistered to MR images segmented into tissue classes (gray matter, white matter, CSF, WMSH, and lacunar infarcts). MTR of WMSH was compared across groups and examined by WMSH location, size, and total burden.

RESULTS: WMSH burden was greater in SIVD patients than in control subjects (2.4% vs 0.67%). MTR of WMSH did not differ between groups, but MTR of periventricular WMSH was lower in SIVD patients than in control subjects (37.6% vs 39.4%). Even after accounting for covariant effects of lesion burden, there was still a trend toward reduced periventricular WMSH MTR in the group with dementia. There was no correlation between WMSH MTR and WMSH lesion size.

CONCLUSION: These findings are consistent with observations that pathologic changes in vascular dementia are most severe in the periventricular white matter and suggest that insight into the pathophysiology of SIVD might be gleaned from studies of the periventricular region.