AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marx, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marx, W. F.
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D. F.

ARTICLE

The Fate of Neuroradiologic Abstracts Presented at National Meetings in 1993: Rate of Subsequent Publication in Peer-Reviewed, Indexed Journals

William F. Marx,a, Harry J. Clofta, Huy M. Doa and David F. Kallmesa

a From the Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville (W.F.M., H.M.D., D.F.K.); and the Department of Radiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (H.J.C.).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Abstract presentations are a valuable means of rapidly conveying new information; however, abstracts that fail to eventually become published are of little use to the general medical community. Our goals were to determine the publication rate of neuroradiologic papers originally presented at national meetings in 1993 and to assess publication rate as a function of neuroradiologic subspecialty and study design.

METHODS: Proceedings from the 1993 ASNR and RSNA meetings were reviewed. A MEDLINE search encompassing 1993–1997 was performed cross-referencing lead author and at least one text word based on the abstract title. All ASNR and RSNA neuroradiologic abstracts were included. Study type, subspecialty classification, and sample size were tabulated. Publication rate, based on study design and neuroradiologic subspecialty, was compared with overall publication rate. Median duration from meeting presentation to publication was calculated, and the journals of publication were noted.

RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent of ASNR abstracts and 33% of RSNA neuroradiologic abstracts were published as articles in indexed medical journals. Publication rates among neuroradiologic subspecialty types were not significantly different. Prospective studies presented at the ASNR were published at a higher rate than were retrospective studies. There was no difference between the publication rate of experimental versus clinical studies. Neuroradiologic abstracts were published less frequently than were abstracts within other medical specialties. Median time between abstract presentation and publication was 15 months.

CONCLUSION: Approximately one third of neuroradiologic abstracts presented at national meetings in 1993 were published in indexed journals. This rate is lower than that of abstracts from medical specialties other than radiology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
N. Sanossian, A. G. Ohanian, J. L. Saver, L. I. Kim, and B. Ovbiagele
Frequency and Determinants of Nonpublication of Research in the Stroke Literature
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2588 - 2592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. J. Rodrigo, B. H. Rowe, M. Blitz, and S. Blitz
There is no evidence to support the use of aerosolized magnesium for acute asthma.
Chest, July 1, 2006; 130(1): 304 - 306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Miguel-Dasit, L. Marti-Bonmati, R. Aleixandre, P. Sanfeliu, and D. Bautista
Publication of Material Presented at Radiologic Meetings: Authors' Country and International Collaboration
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 521 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
E. S. Rosmarakis, E. S. Soteriades, P. I. Vergidis, S. K. Kasiakou, and M. E. Falagas
From conference abstract to full paper: differences between data presented in conferences and journals
FASEB J, May 1, 2005; 19(7): 673 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
S. G. Gandhi and W. M. Gilbert
Society of Gynecologic Investigation: What Gets Published?
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2004; 11(8): 562 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Arrive, P.-Y. Boelle, P. Dono, M. Lewin, L. Monnier-Cholley, and J.-M. Tubiana
Subsequent Publication of Orally Presented Original Studies within 5 Years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 101 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
D S SANDERS, M J CARTER, D P HURLSTONE, A J LOBO, and N HOGGARD
Research outcomes in British gastroenterology: an audit of the subsequent full publication of abstracts presented at the British Society of Gastroenterology
Gut, July 1, 2001; 49(1): 154a - 155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. B. Fontanarosa and A. Flanagin
Prepublication Release of Medical Research
JAMA, December 13, 2000; 284(22): 2927 - 2929.
[Full Text] [PDF]