Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Aprile, I. Articles by Fabris, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Aprile, I. Articles by Fabris, G.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 20:1259-1267 (8 1999)
© 1999 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Analysis of Cystic Intracranial Lesions Performed with Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Imaging

Italo Aprile^,a, Francesca Iaiza^a, Antonino Lavaroni^a, Riccardo Budai^a, Pierluigi Dolso^a, Cathryn A. Scott^a, Carlo A. Beltrami^a and Giuliano Fabris^a

^a From the Departments of Neuroradiology (I.A., F.I., A.L., P.D., G.F.) and Neurology-Clinical Neurophysiology (R.B.), S. Maria della Misericordia General Hospital, and the Institute of Pathology (C.A.S., C.A.B.), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: T1-, T2-, and proton density (PD)-weighted sequences are used to characterize the content of cystic intracranial lesions. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR sequences produce T2-weighted images with water signal saturation. Therefore, we attempted to verify whether FLAIR, as compared with conventional techniques, improves the distinction between intracranial cysts with a free water-like content versus those filled with a non-free water-like substance and, consequently, aids in the identification of these lesions as either neoplastic/inflammatory or maldevelopmental/porencephalic.

METHODS: Forty-five cystic intracranial lesions were studied using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR, and PD-weighted sequences. By means of clustering analysis of the ratio in signal intensity between the cystic intracranial lesions and CSF, the intracranial lesions were classified as filled with a free water-like content or with a non-free water-like substance. The results were compared with their true content as evaluated either histologically or on the basis of clinical, neuroradiologic, and follow-up features (necrotic material, 13 cases; accumulation of intercellular proteinaceous/myxoid material, eight cases; keratin, five cases; CSF, 19 cases). Cystic intracranial lesions were divided into two clinical groups, neoplastic/inflammatory and maldevelopmental/porencephalic, to evaluate the level of accuracy of each MR technique. The difference in absolute value signal intensity between CSF and cystic intracranial lesion content was calculated on FLAIR and PD-weighted images.

RESULTS: PD-weighted and FLAIR sequences, unlike T1- and T2-weighted sequences, accurately depicted all cystic intracranial lesions containing necrotic or myxoid/proteinaceous intercellular material (non-free water-like) and most CSF-containing cystic intracranial lesions (free water-like). All imaging techniques inaccurately showed some of the keratin-containing cystic intracranial lesions and pineal cysts. The overall error rate was 22% for T1-weighted, 27% for T2-weighted, 9% for FLAIR, and 13% for PD-weighted sequences. The signal intensity difference between CSF and cystic intracranial lesion content was higher with FLAIR imaging.

CONCLUSIONS: FLAIR imaging depicts far more accurately the content of cystic intracranial lesions and better reveals the distinction between maldevelopmental/porencephalic and neoplastic/inflammatory lesions than do conventional sequences. FLAIR has the added advantage of a higher signal intensity difference between cystic intracranial lesions and CSF.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. N. Saleem, A.-H. M. Said, and D. H. Lee Lesions of the Hypothalamus: MR Imaging Diagnostic Features RadioGraphics, July 1, 2007; 27(4): 1087 - 1108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Saleh, F Wenserski, M Cohnen, G Furst, E Godehardt, and U Modder Exclusion of brain lesions: is MR contrast medium required after a negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence? Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2004; 77(915): 183 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Bastos Leite, E. C.W. van Straaten, P. Scheltens, G. Lycklama, and F. Barkhof Thalamic Lesions in Vascular Dementia: Low Sensitivity of Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) Imaging Stroke, February 1, 2004; 35(2): 415 - 419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Taoka, W. T. C. Yuh, M. L. White, J. P. Quets, J. E. Maley, and T. Ueda Sulcal Hyperintensity on Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Images in Patients Without Apparent Cerebrospinal Fluid Abnormality Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 519 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]