Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Melhem, E. R. Articles by Barker, P. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Melhem, E. R. Articles by Barker, P. B.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:1813-1820 (11 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Brain: Effect of Diffusion Weighting on Trace and Anisotropy Measurements

Elias R. Melhem^a,b, Ryuta Itoh^a, Lisa Jones^a and Peter B. Barker^a

^a From the Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences (E.R.M., R.I., P.B.B.), The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, and the School of Medicine (L.J.), The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
^b Address reprint requests to Elias R. Melhem, the Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287–2182.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In human brain, the relationship between MR signal and b value is complicated by cerebral perfusion, restricted diffusion, anisotropy, cellular membrane permeability, and active cellular transport of water molecules. Our purpose was to evaluate the effect of the number and strength of diffusion-sensitizing gradients on measured isotropic apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC_i), fractional anisotropy (FA), and their respective SD in different anatomic locations of the brain.

METHODS: Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients and diffusion anisotropy brain maps were obtained from 10 healthy volunteers by using six different levels of diffusion weighting (b0 = 0, b1 = 160, b2 = 320, b3 = 480, b4 = 640, and b5 = 800 s/mm²), applied sequentially in six different directions (G_xx, G_yy, G_zz, G_xy, G_xz, G_yz) and coupled to a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar (2045/115 [TR/TE]) MR imaging technique. ADC_i, FA, eigenvalues (1, 2, 3)¹ of the principal eigenvectors, and their respective SD were measured from seven different anatomic locations in the brain. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate for the existence of significant differences in the average and SD of the calculated ADC_i and FA as a function of the number and strength of b values. When a difference existed, the Bonferroni t method was used for paired comparisons of the groups.

RESULTS: The measured ADC_i was affected by the number and strength of b values (P < .05). The SD of the ADC_i was affected by the strength (P < .05) but not the number of b values (P > .05). The measured FA was unaffected by the number and strength of b values (P > .05). The SD was affected by the number and strength of b values (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: The number and strength of b values do influence measures of diffusion and anisotropy. Attention to the choice of diffusion sensitization parameters is important in decisions regarding clinical feasibility (acquisition time) and normative measures.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. C. Partridge, W. B. DeMartini, B. F. Kurland, P. R. Eby, S. W. White, and C. D. Lehman Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Adjunct to Conventional Breast MRI for Improved Positive Predictive Value Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2009; 193(6): 1716 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Galban, S. Maderwald, F. Stock, and M. E. Ladd Age-Related Changes in Skeletal Muscle as Detected by Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2007; 62(4): 453 - 458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Colosimo, P Pantano, V Calistri, P Totaro, G Fabbrini, and A Berardelli Diffusion tensor imaging in primary cervical dystonia J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2005; 76(11): 1591 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. A.G.M. Huisman, L. H. Schwamm, P. W. Schaefer, W. J. Koroshetz, N. Shetty-Alva, Y. Ozsunar, O. Wu, and A. G. Sorensen Diffusion Tensor Imaging as Potential Biomarker of White Matter Injury in Diffuse Axonal Injury AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 370 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. B. Chepuri, Y.-F. Yen, J. H. Burdette, H. Li, D. M. Moody, and J. A. Maldjian Diffusion Anisotropy in the Corpus Callosum AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2002; 23(5): 803 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. R. Melhem, S. Mori, G. Mukundan, M. A. Kraut, M. G. Pomper, and P. C. M. van Zijl Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of the Brain and White Matter Tractography Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2002; 178(1): 3 - 16. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Mukherjee, J. H. Miller, J. S. Shimony, T. E. Conturo, B. C. P. Lee, C. R. Almli, and R. C. McKinstry Normal Brain Maturation during Childhood: Developmental Trends Characterized with Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 349 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]