AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schellhas, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pollei, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schellhas, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pollei, S. R.

ARTICLE

Cervical Diskography: Analysis of Provoked Responses at C2–C3, C3–C4, and C4–C5

Kurt P. Schellhas,a, Timothy A. Garveya, Blake A. Johnsona, Peter J. Rothbarta and Steven R. Polleia

a From the Center for Diagnostic Imaging, St. Louis Park, MN (K.P.S., B.A.J., S.R.P.); the Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN (T.A.G.); and the Rothbart Pain Clinic, North York, Ontario, Canada (P.J.R.).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous authors have described the locations of provoked responses to cervical diskography from C3–C4 to C6–C7, but we have found no description of the findings at C2–C3. This study was undertaken to analyze the sensations provoked during cervical diskography at C2–C3 and to compare the results with those provoked at C3–C4 and C4–C5.

METHODS: The locations of diskographically provoked responses from 40 consecutive patients who had undergone C2–C3, C3–C4, and C4–C5 diskography were analyzed. Only intensely painful (>= 7/10) and concordant responses were considered. Disk morphology on MR images and diskograms was also compared with the provoked responses.

RESULTS: Eighteen subjects described either unilateral (n = 10) or bilateral (usually asymmetric) (n = 8) concordant pain at the craniovertebral junction in response to C2–C3 diskography. Nine subjects described either unilateral (n = 5) or bilateral (n = 4) neck pain during injection. Cephalalgia or head pain was provoked in 19 subjects, seven bilaterally. Four subjects described either unilateral (n = 3) or bilateral (n = 1) trapezius muscle and/or shoulder pain. Preliminary MR studies were not helpful, as most C2–C3 disks either appeared normal or exhibited nonspecific signs of degeneration. All disks exhibited either fissuring or extradiskal leakage of contrast material at diskography, regardless of the response provoked.

CONCLUSION: Diskography at C2–C3 and C3–C4 frequently produces pain sensations in the head, craniovertebral junction, and neck. There is no correlation between C2–C3 disk morphology and the diskographically provoked response.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. Schofferman, N. Bogduk, and P. Slosar
Chronic Whiplash and Whiplash-Associated Disorders: An Evidence-Based Approach
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2007; 15(10): 596 - 606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. S. Bartynski, S. Z. Grahovac, and W. E. Rothfus
Cervical Diskography Performed with a "Prong Deflector" for Improved Access to the Cervical Disk Spaces
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1004 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
Y. Kakitsubata, S. J. Theodorou, D. J. Theodorou, K. Nabeshima, S. Kakitsubata, and S. Tamura
Sonographic Characterization of the Lumbar Intervertebral Disk With Anatomic Correlation and Histopathologic Findings
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2005; 24(4): 489 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]