Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dix, J. Articles by Skrocki, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dix, J. Articles by Skrocki, J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:639-642 (4 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Evaluation of Carotid Stenosis by Angiography: Potential Bias toward Overestimated Measurements Introduced by Prior Interpretation of Doppler Sonograms

James Dix^,a and James Skrocki^a

^a From the David Grant Medical Center, Department of Radiology SGSX, 101 Bodin Circle, Travis Air Force Base, CA 94535.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries is routinely performed before catheter angiography, and its results may bias the subsequent interpretation of angiograms. We attempt to establish that Doppler sonography may show an exagerrated degree of carotid stenosis, introducing bias to the evaluation of carotid stenosis by subsequent catheter angiography.

METHODS: Angiograms of the carotid arteries obtained to evaluate potential carotid stenosis in patients who had undergone Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries were retrospectively reviewed (from 1993 to 1998). Readers who were blinded to the previous interpretations of the angiography and Doppler sonography results measured carotid stenosis. The results of Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries were not re-evaluated. Based on the original Doppler sonograms, stenoses were categorized as normal/mild (<30%), moderate (30–59%), severe (60–79%), and critical (80–99%). Within these categories, the differences between the original percent stenosis, as determined by angiography, and the blinded measurements were determined.

RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with angiographically measurable stenoses in 128 vessels were identified. The difference between the blinded readers was 3% (±8%), with no category statistically different from the other. The difference between original and remeasured stenoses in carotid arteries in the Doppler categories were as follows: mild stenosis, 2% (±9%); moderate stenosis, 6% (±15%); severe stenosis, 8% (±15%); and critical stenosis, 22% (±12%). A significant overestimation occurred in the severe (P < .05) and critical (P < .0001) stenosis categories. One third of patients with stenoses in the severe or critical Doppler category had significant stenoses on the original angiograms that were less than 60%, according to blinded remeasurement.

CONCLUSION: Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries has the potential to bias the subsequent interpretation of catheter angiography. Care must be taken to measure stenosis accurately, using strict criteria to determine the potential benefit of carotid endarterectomy for the individual patient and to ensure that the criteria for Doppler sonography of the carotid arteries are based on accurate catheter angiography measurements.