Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Miki, A. Articles by Liu, G. T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Miki, A. Articles by Liu, G. T.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:910-915 (5 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Reproducibility of Visual Activation in Functional MR Imaging and Effects of Postprocessing

Atsushi Miki^,a, Jonathan Raz^a, Theo G. M. van Erp^a, Chia-Shang J. Liu^a, John C. Haselgrove^a and Grant T. Liu^a

^a From the Department of Neurology (Division of Neuro-ophthalmology), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (A.M., G.T.L.); the Division of Biostatistics (J.R.) and the Department of Psychology (T.G.M.v.E.), University of Pennsylvania; the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (C-S.J.L.); and the Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.C.H.).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Functional MR imaging studies of the brain should be interpreted in the context of their reproducibility. We assessed the reproducibility of visual activation measured by functional MR imaging and analyzed the effect of image transformation to standard space.

METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers were studied twice with echo-planner functional MR imaging at 1.5 T during visual stimulation. The studies were separated by an interval of 2 to 7 days. Functional images were analyzed after spatial normalization to the space described by Talairach and Tournoux and/or after coregistration of the images of the second study with the images of the first study. The number of active voxels for each study was determined at three thresholds. In addition, the change in the center of the mass of activation, the mean change in signal intensity, and the mean t value within the activated area were measured. These reproducibility indexes were calculated for the spatially normalized and nonnormalized data for each subject.

RESULTS: Variations in visual activation were observed between the two studies in the same individual as well as across subjects. There was no evidence of an effect from image transformation on reproducibility on any of the measures.

CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the reproducibility of activation in functional MR imaging may be much more variable across subjects than suggested in previous studies. The use of different types of image transformation (coregistration, spatial normalization) does not significantly affect the reproducibility of visual activation.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G.S. Harrington, M.H. Buonocore, and S. T. Farias Intrasubject reproducibility of functional MR imaging activation in language tasks. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 938 - 944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Marshall, E. Simonotto, I. J. Deary, A. Maclullich, K. P. Ebmeier, E. J. Rose, J. M. Wardlaw, N. Goddard, and F. M. Chappell Repeatability of Motor and Working-Memory Tasks in Healthy Older Volunteers: Assessment at Functional MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 868 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.-J. Vlieger, C. Lavini, C. B. Majoie, and G. J. den Heeten Reproducibility of Functional MR Imaging Results Using Two Different MR Systems AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2003; 24(4): 652 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]