AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, L. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castillo, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, L. L.

ARTICLE

Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Offers No Advantage over Routine Noncontrast MR Imaging in the Detection of Vertebral Metastases

Mauricio Castillo,a, Andres Arbelaeza, J. Keith Smitha and Laurie L. Fishera

a From the Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Campus Box 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine has been used to differentiate benign from pathologic vertebral body compression fractures. We sought to determine the utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases and to compare it with conventional noncontrast T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging.

METHODS: Fifteen patients with metastases to the spine were studied using conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. Blinded review of all images was undertaken, and patients were categorized according to whether they had focal or multiple lesions. The signal intensity of the lesions was compared on T1-, T2- (fast spin-echo), and diffusion-weighted images.

RESULTS: In five patients with focal disease, metastases were hypointense on T1-weighted images; hypointense (n = 2), isointense (n = 1), or hyperintense (n = 2) on T2-weighted images; and hypointense (n = 3) or hyperintense (n = 2) on diffusion-weighted images with respect to presumed normal bone marrow. In 10 patients with disease in multiple sites, all lesions were hypointense on T1-weighted images; hypointense (n = 2), isointense (n = 4), hyperintense (n = 2), or mixed (n = 2) on T2-weighted images; and hypointense (n = 5), hyperintense (n = 3), or mixed (n = 2) on diffusion-weighted images with respect to presumed normal bone marrow.

CONCLUSION: As used in this study, diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the spine showed no advantage in the detection and characterization of vertebral metastases as compared with noncontrast T1-weighted imaging, but was considered superior to T2-weighted imaging.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. Luboldt, R. Kufer, N. Blumstein, T. L. Toussaint, A. Kluge, M. D. Seemann, and H.-J. Luboldt
Prostate Carcinoma: Diffusion-weighted Imaging as Potential Alternative to Conventional MR and 11C-Choline PET/CT for Detection of Bone Metastases
Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 1017 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.J. Nemeth, J.W. Henson, M.E. Mullins, R.G. Gonzalez, and P.W. Schaefer
Improved Detection of Skull Metastasis with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1088 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D.-M. Koh and D. J. Collins
Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Body: Applications and Challenges in Oncology
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2007; 188(6): 1622 - 1635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.Y. Oner, T. Tali, F. Celikyay, A. Celik, and P. Le Roux
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine with a Non-Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Single-Shot Fast Spin-Echo Sequence: Initial Experience
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 575 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W.K. Erly, E.S. Oh, and E.K. Outwater
The Utility of In-Phase/Opposed-Phase Imaging in Differentiating Malignancy from Acute Benign Compression Fractures of the Spine
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1183 - 1188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. M. Barragan-Campos, J.-N. Vallee, D. Lo, E. Cormier, B. Jean, M. Rose, P. Astagneau, and J. Chiras
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Spinal Metastases: Complications
Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 354 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. Maeda, H. Sakuma, S. E. Maier, and K. Takeda
Quantitative Assessment of Diffusion Abnormalities in Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures by Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2003; 181(5): 1203 - 1209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. V. Mulkern, R. B. Schwartz, X. J. Zhou, N. E. Leeds, A. J. Kumar, and G. C. McKinnon
In Re: Characterization of Benign and Metastatic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Quantitative Diffusion MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2003; 24(7): 1489 - 1491.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M. Castillo
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Spine: Is It Reliable?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1251 - 1253.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Jaramillo, S. A. Connolly, S. Vajapeyam, R. L. Robertson, P. S. Dunning, R. V. Mulkern, A. Hayward, S. E. Maier, and F. Shapiro
Normal and Ischemic Epiphysis of the Femur: Diffusion MR Imaging— Study in Piglets
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R. Bammer, A. M. Herneth, S. E. Maier, K. Butts, R. W. Prokesch, H. M. Do, S. W. Atlas, and M. E. Moseley
Line Scan Diffusion Imaging of the Spine
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2003; 24(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. M. Herneth, M. O. Philipp, J. Naude, M. Funovics, R. R. Beichel, R. Bammer, and H. Imhof
Vertebral Metastases: Assessment with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 889 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
W. M. Byun, S. O. Shin, Y. Chang, S. J. Lee, J. Finsterbusch, and J. Frahm
Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Metastatic Disease of the Spine: Assessment of Response to Therapy
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2002; 23(6): 906 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J H M Chan, W C G Peh, E Y K Tsui, L F Chau, K K Cheung, K B Chan, M K Yuen, E T H Wong, and K P C Wong
Acute vertebral body compression fractures: discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent diffusion coefficients
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2002; 75(891): 207 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Falcone
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Distinction of Benign from Metastatic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Is This a Numbers Game?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 5 - 6.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
X. J. Zhou, N. E. Leeds, G. C. McKinnon, and A. J. Kumar
Characterization of Benign and Metastatic Vertebral Compression Fractures with Quantitative Diffusion MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 165 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D. A. Finelli
Diffusion-weighted Imaging of Acute Vertebral Compressions: Specific Diagnosis of Benign Versus Malignant Pathologic Fractures
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2001; 22(2): 241 - 242.
[Full Text] [PDF]