Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Erly, W. K. Articles by Seeger, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Erly, W. K. Articles by Seeger, J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:964-967 (5 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as a Contrast Agent in Common Carotid Arteriography

William K. Erly^,a, Julie Zaetta^a, Guy T. Borders^a, Hasan Ozgur^a, Dina R. Gabaeff^a, Raymond F. Carmody^a and Joachim Seeger^a

^a From the Department of Radiology, The University of Arizona Health Science Center, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite improvements in noninvasive imaging, some patients with contraindications to iodine-based contrast material still require angiography for the evaluation of carotid stenosis. Our aim was to assess the utility of gadopentetate dimeglumine as an intraarterial contrast agent in common carotid angiography.

METHODS: Twelve patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis were enrolled in the study. In addition to the standard injection sequences with iohexol, common carotid arteriograms were obtained after administration of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Neurologic status and vital signs were monitored during and for 6 hours after the examination. For each injection, five independent observers, blinded to the contrast agent used, measured the percentage of carotid stenosis and assessed their confidence in grading the stenosis, the overall quality of the examination, and, in cases of decreased quality, the reason(s) for it. Statistical analysis was done with paired and unpaired t-tests with equal variances.

RESULTS: No patient had an adverse clinical outcome, and measurements of carotid artery stenosis showed no statistically significant differences between the gadopentetate dimeglumine and iohexol examinations. Overall image quality and observer confidence in measurements of stenosis on the gadolinium-based studies were slightly but significantly lower than those of identical iodine-based studies.

CONCLUSION: Gadopentetate dimeglumine may be an alternative to iodine in selected patients undergoing carotid angiography. Although overall image quality of the gadolinium studies is slightly inferior to that of the iohexol studies, measurements of carotid artery stenosis are similar for the two examinations.