American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:1021-1027 (6 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLE
Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of Supraaortic Vessels: The Effect of Voxel Size on Image Quality
a From the Departments of Neuroradiology (X.L., J.Y.G, V.L T., J.P.P.) and Neurology (D.L.), Hôpital Roger Salengro, University Hospital of Lille (France); and the Medical Division, Siemens (L.N), Saint-Denis (France).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several acquisition strategies may be used for imaging supraaortic vessels by using contrast-enhanced MR angiography. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of voxel size on image quality of MR angiograms.
METHODS: Fourty-four patients underwent 3D MR angiography in the coronal plane. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups according to the voxel size of MR angiograms: group 1 referred to a 1.3 x 1.29 x 1.25-mm voxel size and group 2 to a 0.95 x 0.76 x 0.82-mm voxel size. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured and image artifacts were analyzed by consensus between observers. The delineation of the arterial lumen was independently ranked on a four-point scale (1 = not assessable; 2 = poor delineation; 3 = fair delineation; 4 = optimal delineation).
RESULTS: The overall interobserver agreement for the delineation of the arterial lumen was good (
= .84, P < .0001), with a rank significantly higher in group 2 (68% of arteries graded as 4) compared with group 1 (76% graded as 3). SNRs were significantly higher by using the conventional resolution technique, with a negative correlation between SNRs and artery delineation (P < .0001). Image artifacts, however, were more frequent with the high-resolution technique, including wrap-around artifacts and signal fall-off at the origin of the great vessels.
CONCLUSION: MR angiograms with a decreased voxel size improve the delineation of cervical carotid and vertebral arteries, despite reduced SNRs and additional artifacts.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  M. Anzidei, A. Napoli, B. C. Marincola, I. Nofroni, D. Geiger, F. Zaccagna, C. Catalano, and R. Passariello Gadofosveset-enhanced MR Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Does Steady-State Imaging Improve Accuracy of First-Pass Imaging? Comparison with Selective Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 457 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, M.S. Krishnam, J.P. Finn, and J.P. Villablanca 3D High-Spatial-Resolution Cerebral MR Venography at 3T: A Contrast-Dose-Reduction Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Tomasian, N. Salamon, D. G. Lohan, M. Jalili, J. P. Villablanca, and J. P. Finn Supraaortic Arteries: Contrast Material Dose Reduction at 3.0-T High-Spatial-Resolution MR Angiography--Feasibility Study Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 980 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Nael, J. P. Villablanca, L. Mossaz, W. Pope, A. Juncosa, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn 3-T Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in Evaluation of Suspected Intracranial Aneurysm: Comparison with MDCT Angiography Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 389 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Nael, J. P. Villablanca, W. B. Pope, T. O. McNamara, G. Laub, and J. P. Finn Supraaortic Arteries: Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography at 3.0 T--Highly Accelerated Parallel Acquisition for Improved Spatial Resolution over an Extended Field of View Radiology, February 1, 2007; 242(2): 600 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. W. Yang, J. C. Carr, S. F. Futterer, M. D. Morasch, B. P. Yang, S. M. Shors, and J. P. Finn Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2005; 26(8): 2095 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. A. Willinek, M. von Falkenhausen, M. Born, J. Gieseke, T. Holler, T. Klockgether, H. J. Textor, H. H. Schild, and H. Urbach Noninvasive Detection of Steno-Occlusive Disease of the Supra-Aortic Arteries With Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Prospective, Intra-Individual Comparative Analysis With Digital Subtraction Angiography Stroke, January 1, 2005; 36(1): 38 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Alvarez-Linera, J. Benito-Leon, J. Escribano, J. Campollo, and R. Gesto Prospective Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Spiral CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2003; 24(5): 1012 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. A. Willinek, J. Gieseke, R. Conrad, H. Strunk, R. Hoogeveen, M. von Falkenhausen, E. Keller, H. Urbach, C. K. Kuhl, and H. H. Schild Randomly Segmented Central k-Space Ordering in High-Spatial-Resolution Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography of the Supraaortic Arteries: Initial Experience Radiology, November 1, 2002; 225(2): 583 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. H. Gillard, B. D. M. Tom, W. Hollingworth, B. Randoux, B. Marro, F. Koskas, M. Duyme, M. Sahel, A. Zouaoui, and C. Marsault Validation of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Newer Techniques * Dr Randoux and colleagues respond: Radiology, May 1, 2002; 223(2): 586 - 587. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Remonda, P. Senn, A. Barth, M. Arnold, K.-O. Lovblad, and G. Schroth Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography of the Carotid Artery: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2002; 23(2): 213 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|