AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuasa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kanda, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuasa, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kanda, S.

ARTICLE

Sonography for the Detection of Cervical Lymph Node Metastases among Patients with Tongue Cancer:Criteria for Early Detection and Assessment ofFollow-up Examination Intervals

Kenji Yuasa,a, Toshiyuki Kawazua, Naonobu Kunitakea, Satoru Ueharaa, Junichi Omagaria, Kazunori Yoshiuraa, Eiji Nakayamaa and Shigenobu Kandaa

a From the Departments of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (Ke.Y., T.K., Ka.Y. E.N., S.K.) and Radiology (N.K.), Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582 Japan; the Department of Radiology (S.U.), Kyushu Medical Center; and the Department of Radiology (J.O.), New Koga Hospital, Tenjin-cho 120, Kurume 830-0033, Japan

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because the presence of cervical metastasis is one of the factors influencing the outcome of patients with carcinoma of the head and neck, its early detection is potentially very important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the characteristic changes of cervical metastasis revealed by sonography during follow-up and to assess an adequate interval for follow-up sonography of the neck among patients with tongue cancer.

METHODS: Forty-three of 44 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, who had undergone interstitial brachytherapy, were examined with sonography of the neck during the posttherapeutic follow-up period.

RESULTS: Seventeen cervical lymph node metastases were found in 12 of 43 patients during follow-up. Of these 17 cervical metastases, 16 (94.1%) were accurately diagnosed and one (5.9%) was misdiagnosed as nonmetastatic based on sonographic findings. Sonography of the neck performed in seven patients at an interval of less than 1 month since the last follow-up imaging showed 9 (90.0%) of 10 metastases increased by up to 2 mm in short-axis diameter. Five patients who were followed up at an interval of more than 1 month since the last follow-up imaging had seven metastases increase by 3 to 8 mm in short-axis diameter or a change of echogenicity in the internal structure of lymph nodes or both. Pathologic examinations showed extranodal spread in 3 (42.9%) of these 7 metastases.

CONCLUSION: Changes both in size and internal echogenicity can occur as quickly as 2 to 4 weeks between sonographic examinations. Therefore, in high-risk patients, or in those with suspicious sonographic findings, short-interval follow-up sonographic examinations are recommended at least during the first posttherapeutic year. Our findings suggest that follow-up sonography of the neck should be performed monthly, at least during the first posttherapeutic year.