Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chan, L.-L. Articles by Ginsberg, L. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chan, L.-L. Articles by Ginsberg, L. E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:1315-1319 (7 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

The Pterygopalatine Fossa: Postoperative MR Imaging Appearance

Ling-Ling Chan^a, June Chong^a, Ann M. Gillenwater^a and Lawrence E. Ginsberg^a

^a From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (L.-L.C, J.C., L.E.G.) and Head and Neck Surgery (A.M.G.), The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) is an important anatomic location of the deep portion of the face. It is essential to review this area on both pre- and posttreatment studies of head and neck malignancies to assess local extent of disease or recurrence and perineural tumor spread. The purpose of this study was to review the postoperative appearance of the PPF on MR images.

METHODS: Imaging and clinical data of 10 patients who underwent surgical resection of tumor in which the PPF was violated at surgery were reviewed. Patients were included in the study if there was no imaging or clinical evidence of tumor in the PPF pre- or postoperatively. Postoperative MR studies were examined to assess the appearance of the PPF.

RESULTS: The PPF is consistently and persistently abnormal after surgical violation. There is loss of the normal T1 signal hyperintensity and abnormal, increased contrast enhancement, as seen on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images. These postoperative changes are strikingly similar to those of tumor involvement.

CONCLUSION: After surgical violation, the PPF will always appear abnormal on MR images, and the expected imaging findings must be recognized to avoid the misdiagnosis of tumor recurrence.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D.M. Yousem, K. Gad, and R.P. Tufano Resectability Issues with Head and Neck Cancer AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2006; 27(10): 2024 - 2036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]