American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:1654-1660 (10 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLE
CT of the Head by Use of Reduced Current and Kilovoltage: Relationship between Image Quality and Dose Reduction
a From the Institute of Diagnostic Radiology (M.C., H.F., U.M.), the Department of Neurosurgery (J.H., E.L.), and Center for Anatomy and Brain Research (R.K.), Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CT is a frequent examination that is performed using ionizing radiation. We sought to assess image-quality changes on CT scans of the head when the radiation dose is reduced by changing tube current and kilovoltage.
METHODS: A formalin-fixed cadaver was examined in conventional and helical mode by use of two CT-scanners. Surface dose was measured with standard scanning parameters, and after reduction of tube current and kilovoltage. Five experienced examiners independently evaluated subjective image quality.
RESULTS: In the conventional mode, the highest surface dose was 83.2 mGy (scanner 1: helical mode, 55.6 mGy), and 66.0 mGy (scanner 2: helical mode, 55.9 mGy). By changing kVp and mAs, a dose reduction of up to 75% (scanner 1), and 60% (scanner 2) was achieved. No observable differences in image quality between scans obtained with doses from 100% to 60% of standard settings were noted. Ten of 20 images obtained with the highest dose and 13 of 20 images obtained with lowest dose (19–29.4 mGy) were reliably identified by subjective quality assessment. Scans produced with a surface dose of less than 30 mGy were judged uninterpretable.
CONCLUSION: Standard parameters used in cranial CT are oriented toward best image quality. A dose reduction up to 40% may be possible without loss of diagnostic image quality.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R Olszewski, H Reychler, G Cosnard, J M Denis, S Vynckier, and F Zech Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., July 1, 2008; 37(5): 261 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U.K. Udayasankar, K. Braithwaite, M. Arvaniti, D. Tudorascu, W.C. Small, S. Little, and S. Palasis Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT Protocol for Follow-Up Evaluation of Children with Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt: Reduction of Radiation and Effect on Image Quality AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 802 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Alcala-Galiano, I. J. Arribas-Garcia, M. A. Martin-Perez, A. Romance, J. J. Montalvo-Moreno, and J. M. M. Juncos Pediatric Facial Fractures: Children Are Not Just Small Adults RadioGraphics, March 1, 2008; 28(2): 441 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Waaijer, M. Prokop, B. K. Velthuis, C. J. G. Bakker, G. A. P. de Kort, and M. S. van Leeuwen Circle of Willis at CT Angiography: Dose Reduction and Image Quality--Reducing Tube Voltage and Increasing Tube Current Settings Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 832 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Cohnen, H.-J. Wittsack, S. Assadi, K. Muskalla, A. Ringelstein, L.W. Poll, A. Saleh, and U. Modder Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1741 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Nakayama, K. Awai, Y. Funama, M. Hatemura, M. Imuta, T. Nakaura, D. Ryu, S. Morishita, S. Sultana, N. Sato, et al. Abdominal CT with Low Tube Voltage: Preliminary Observations about Radiation Dose, Contrast Enhancement, Image Quality, and Noise Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 945 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. C. O'Daniel, D. M. Stevens, and D. D. Cody Reducing Radiation Exposure from Survey CT Scans Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 509 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Fox Use of the Lowest Necessary Radiation Dose AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 519 - 519. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Mullins, M. H. Lev, P. Bove, C. E. O'Reilly, S. Saini, J. T. Rhea, J. H. Thrall, G. J. Hunter, L. M. Hamberg, and R. G. Gonzalez Comparison of Image Quality Between Conventional and Low-Dose Nonenhanced Head CT AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 533 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, T. L. Toth, L. M. Hamberg, M. A. Blake, J.-A. Shepard, and S. Saini Strategies for CT Radiation Dose Optimization Radiology, March 1, 2004; 230(3): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Boone, E. M. Geraghty, J. A. Seibert, and S. L. Wootton-Gorges Dose Reduction in Pediatric CT: A Rational Approach Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 352 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, C. Wittram, M. M. Maher, A. Sharma, G. B. Avinash, K. Karau, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, S. Saini, and J.-A. Shepard Can Noise Reduction Filters Improve Low-Radiation-Dose Chest CT Images? Pilot Study Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, M. M. Maher, D. V. Sahani, M. A. Blake, P. F. Hahn, G. B. Avinash, T. L. Toth, E. Halpern, and S. Saini Low-Dose CT of the Abdomen: Evaluation of Image Improvement with Use of Noise Reduction Filters—Pilot Study Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 251 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Kalra, S. Prasad, S. Saini, M. A. Blake, J. Varghese, E. F. Halpern, J. T. Rhea, and J. H. Thrall Clinical Comparison of Standard-Dose and 50% Reduced--Dose Abdominal CT: Effect on Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2002; 179(5): 1101 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. R. Prasad, C. Wittram, J.-A. Shepard, T. McLoud, and J. Rhea Standard-Dose and 50%--Reduced-Dose Chest CT: Comparing the Effect on Image Quality Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2002; 179(2): 461 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. R. Haaga Radiation Dose Management: Weighing Risk Versus Benefit Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 289 - 291. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|