American Journal of Neuroradiology 21:1688-1698 (10 2000)
© 2000 American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLE
Fast MR Imaging of Fetal CNS Anomalies in Utero
a From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (E.M.S., R.B.G., F.V.C., R.A.F., K.C.B., A.J.B.) and Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences (T.J.M.), University of California, San Francisco.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although sonography is the primary imaging technique for evaluating the developing fetus, significant limitations exist in the sonographic prenatal diagnosis of many brain disorders. Fast MR imaging is increasingly being used to determine the underlying cause of nonspecific fetal CNS abnormalities detected sonographically and to confirm or provide further support for such anomalies. Our goal was to determine the value of MR imaging in establishing the diagnosis of fetal CNS anomalies, to ascertain how this information might be used for patient counseling, and to assess its impact on pregnancy management.
METHODS: We prospectively performed MR examinations of 73 fetuses (66 pregnancies) with suspected CNS abnormalities and compared these with available fetal sonograms, postnatal images, and clinical examinations. Retrospectively, the impact on patient counseling and pregnancy management was analyzed.
RESULTS: Images of diagnostic quality were routinely obtained with in utero MR imaging, which was particularly valuable in detecting heterotopia, callosal anomalies, and posterior fossa malformations, and for providing excellent anatomic information. We believe that 24 (46%) of 52 clinical cases were managed differently from the way they would have been on the basis of sonographic findings alone. In every case, the referring physicians thought that MR imaging provided a measure of confidence that was not previously available and that was valuable for counseling patients and for making more informed decisions.
CONCLUSION: Sonography is the leading technique for fetal assessment and provides reliable, inexpensive diagnostic images. Fast MR imaging is an important adjunctive tool for prenatal imaging in those instances in which a complex anomaly is suspected by sonography, when fetal surgery is contemplated, or when a definitive diagnosis cannot be determined.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P.D. Griffiths, M.J. Reeves, J.E. Morris, G. Mason, S.A. Russell, M.N.J. Paley, and E.H. Whitby A Prospective Study of Fetuses with Isolated Ventriculomegaly Investigated by Antenatal Sonography and In Utero MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2010; 31(1): 106 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levine, H. A. Feldman, J. F. Kazan Tannus, J. A. Estroff, M. Magnino, C. D. Robson, T. Y. Poussaint, C. E. Barnewolt, T. S. Mehta, and R. L. Robertson Frequency and Cause of Disagreements in Diagnoses for Fetuses Referred for Ventriculomegaly Radiology, May 1, 2008; 247(2): 516 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levine, C. Cavazos, J. F. Kazan-Tannus, C. A. McKenzie, V. Dialani, C. D. Robson, R. L. Robertson, T. Y. Poussaint, R. F. Busse, and N. M. Rofsky Evaluation of real-time single-shot fast spin-echo MRI for visualization of the fetal midline corpus callosum and secondary palate. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1505 - 1511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O.A. Glenn and J. Barkovich Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: part 2. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1807 - 1814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O.A. Glenn and A.J. Barkovich Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1604 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Chen, E. M. Simon, J. C. Haselgrove, L. T. Bilaniuk, L. N. Sutton, M. P. Johnson, D. M. Shera, and R. A. Zimmerman Fetal Posterior Fossa Volume: Assessment with MR Imaging Radiology, March 1, 2006; 238(3): 997 - 1003. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. von Koch, O. A. Glenn, R. B. Goldstein, and A. J. Barkovich Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhances Detection of Spinal Cord Anomalies in Patients With Sonographically Detected Bony Anomalies of the Spine J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 781 - 789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Glenn, R. B. Goldstein, K. C. Li, S. J. Young, M. E. Norton, R. F. Busse, J. D. Goldberg, and A. J. Barkovich Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Fetuses Referred for Sonographically Suspected Abnormalities of the Corpus Callosum J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2005; 24(6): 791 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Farhataziz, J. E. Engels, R. M. Ramus, M. Zaretsky, and D. M. Twickler Fetal MRI of Urine and Meconium by Gestational Age for the Diagnosis of Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Abnormalities Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1891 - 1897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Garel, A.-L. Delezoide, M. Elmaleh-Berges, F. Menez, C. Fallet-Bianco, E. Vuillard, D. Luton, J.-F. Oury, and G. Sebag Contribution of Fetal MR Imaging in the Evaluation of Cerebral Ischemic Lesions AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2004; 25(9): 1563 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hassibi, N. Farhataziz, M. Zaretsky, D. McIntire, and D. M. Twickler Optimization of Fetal Weight Estimates Using MRI: Comparison of Acquisitions Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2004; 183(2): 487 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Frates, A. J. Kumar, C. B. Benson, V. L. Ward, and C. M. Tempany Fetal Anomalies: Comparison of MR Imaging and US for Diagnosis Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 398 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Pulitzer, E. M. Simon, T. M. Crombleholme, and J. A. Golden Prenatal MR Findings of the Middle Interhemispheric Variant of Holoprosencephaly AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2004; 25(6): 1034 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Valsky, L. Ben-Sira, S. Porat, N. Yanai, A. Lewin, M. Nadjari, J. M. Gomori, and S. Yagel The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Isolated Mild Ventriculomegaly J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 519 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. V. Coakley, O. A. Glenn, A. Qayyum, A. J. Barkovich, R. Goldstein, and R. A. Filly Fetal MRI: A Developing Technique for the Developing Patient Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 243 - 252. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levine, P. D. Barnes, R. R. Robertson, G. Wong, and T. S. Mehta Fast MR Imaging of Fetal Central Nervous System Abnormalities Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 51 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. F. Reichel, R. M. Ramus, J. T. Caire, L. S. Hynan, K. P. Magee, and D. M. Twickler Fetal Central Nervous System Biometry on MR Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2003; 180(4): 1155 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W Flake Surgery in the human fetus: the future J. Physiol., February 15, 2003; 547(1): 45 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Scher Topical Review: Fetal and Neonatal Neurologic Case Histories: Assessment of Brain Disorders in the Context of Fetal-Maternal-Placental Disease. Part 1: Fetal Neurologic Consultations in the Context of Antepartum Events and Prenatal Brain Development J Child Neurol, February 1, 2003; 18(2): 85 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Levine, I. Trop, T. S. Mehta, and P. D. Barnes MR Imaging Appearance of Fetal Cerebral Ventricular Morphology Radiology, June 1, 2002; 223(3): 652 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





