Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Haney, S. M. Articles by Toga, A. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Haney, S. M. Articles by Toga, A. W.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:73-82 (1 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Tracking Tumor Growth Rates in Patients with Malignant Gliomas: A Test of Two Algorithms

Sean M. Haney^a, Paul M. Thompson^a, Timothy F. Cloughesy^a, Jeffry R. Alger^a and Arthur W. Toga^,a

^a From the Laboratory of Neuro Imaging, Department of Neurology, Division of Brain Mapping (S.M.H., P.M.T., A.W.T.), the Neuro Oncology Program (T.F.C.), the Henry E. Singleton Brain Cancer Research Program (T.F.C.), and the Department of Radiological Sciences (J.R.A.), University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Two 3D image analysis algorithms, nearest-neighbor tissue segmentation and surface modeling, were applied separately to serial MR images in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Rates of volumetric change were tracked for contrast-enhancing tumor tissue. Our purpose was to compare the two image analysis algorithms in their ability to track tumor volume relative to a manually defined standard of reference.

METHODS: Three-dimensional T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spoiled gradient-echo MR volumes were acquired in 10 patients with GBM. One of two protocols was observed: 1) a nearest-neighbor algorithm, which used manually determined or propagated tags and automatically segmented tissues into specific classes to determine tissue volume; or 2) a surface modeling algorithm, which used operator-defined contrast-enhancing boundaries to convert traced points into a parametric mesh model. Volumes were automatically calculated from the mesh models. Volumes determined by each algorithm were compared with the standard of reference, generated by manual segmentation of contrast-enhancing tissue in each cross section of a scan.

RESULTS: Nearest-neighbor algorithm enhancement volumes were highly correlated with manually segmented volumes, as were growth rates, which were measured in terms of halving and doubling times. Enhancement volumes generated by the surface modeling algorithm were also highly correlated with the standard of reference, although growth rates were not.

CONCLUSION: The nearest-neighbor tissue segmentation algorithm provides significant power in quantifying tumor volume and in tracking growth rates of contrast-enhancing tissue in patients with GBM. The surface modeling algorithm is able to quantify tumor volume reliably as well.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P.-Y. LAU and S. OZAWA A Simple Method for Detecting Tumor in T2-Weighted MRI Brain Images: An Image-Based Analysis IEICE Trans D: Information, March 1, 2006; E89-D(3): 1270 - 1279. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Binder, M. C. Genovese, J. T. Merrill, R. I. Morris, and A. L. Metzger Computer-Assisted Pattern Recognition of Autoantibody Results Clin. Vaccine Immunol., December 1, 2005; 12(12): 1353 - 1357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]