AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alberico, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lobel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alberico, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lobel, J.

BRAIN

Focal Enhancement of Cranial Nerve V after Radiosurgery with the Leksell Gamma Knife: Experience in 15 Patients with Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia

Ronald A. Albericoa, Robert A. Fenstermakera and Jeffery Lobela

a From the Departments of Diagnostic Radiology (R.A.A.) and Neurosurgery (R.A.F., J.L.), Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gamma knife radiosurgery is an alternative for the treatment of medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. Few reports of posttreatment MR imaging appearance of cranial nerve V exist. Our purpose was to define MR imaging characteristics in cranial nerve V after gamma knife radiosurgery.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed MR images of 15 patients who underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. Radiation doses were 35–45 Gy at the 50% isodose line. Thin-section T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced T1-weighted images were obtained the day of radiosurgery and within the next 5 mo. Images were scored for enhancement and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images. Time to follow-up imaging and radiation dose were recorded.

RESULTS: Mean time to follow-up imaging was 61 ± 29 d. Posttreatment T2-weighted images showed stable signal intensity in all cases, with radiosurgical target site enhancement in 10. All five patients whose images did not show treatment-related enhancement received radiation doses of 35 Gy. The data suggested a correlation between enhancement with radiation dose (P = .06). No correlation of enhancement with treatment response or time to follow-up existed (P > .05).

CONCLUSION: The trigeminal nerve often enhances at the target site after radiosurgery. Lack of trigeminal nerve enhancement occurred only with lower doses (35 Gy at 50%). MR imaging may be useful to confirm the presence and location of the treatment site after gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.