AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Norbash, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Norbash, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, R. J.

ARTICLE

Videographic Assessment of the Embolic Characteristics of Three Polymeric Compounds: Ethylene Vinyl Alcohol, Cellulose Acetate, and Liquid Urethane

Alexander M. Norbash,a and Robert J. Singera

a From the Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital (A.M.N.), and the Division of Vascular Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital (R.J.S.), Harvard University, Boston, MA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Aneurysms have been clinically and experimentally treated with various surgical and endovascular methods, including endovascular polymer instillation. Additional tools may help to identify advantages and disadvantages of polymeric aneurysm treatment. We assessed the value of high-resolution videography to compare in vitro embolization characteristics of ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (VIN), cellulose acetate polymer (ACE), and urethane copolymer (UCO).

METHODS: In a "neck-up" glass aneurysm model, solutions of 8% and 12% VIN, 8% and 12% ACE, and 8% UCO were introduced through a microcatheter into a xanthan gum solution at three flow rates: full physiological (62 cm/s), half physiological, and flow arrest. Each formulation was then introduced into a "neck-down" aneurysm model at flow arrest, for a total of 20 experiments. Results were tabulated for six different categories: outflow tail formation, inflow-zone polymer-mass deformation, inflow-zone migration, detachment tail formation, adherent mass pullout, and conjectural net effect.

RESULTS: Of the 20 experiments, nine had unacceptable results because of potential clinical complications. The results were unacceptable in four of eight VIN experiments, four of eight ACE experiments, and one of four UCO experiments. VIN performance was more dependent on flow arrest than the more viscous ACE. The growth of the ACE solutions was most circumferential, with balloonlike growth characteristics, little inflow-zone effects, and fewer outflow tails than seen with VIN. All compounds had the potential for partial catheter adhesion and catheter-adhesing tails. UCO had the highest percentage of favorable results and the lowest percentage of unfavorable results.

CONCLUSION: Videographic analysis allows detailed assessment of the dynamic embolization characteristics of polymers, revealing potential advantages of compounds such as UCO.