American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:650-653 (4 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLE
Assessment of Silent Embolism from Carotid Endarterectomy by Use of Diffusion-weighted Imaging: Work in Progress
a From theDivisions of Neuroradiology (K.P.N.F., P.M.B., J.E.H.), Neurology (H.A.S.), and Neurosurgery (J.M.Z., R.F.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Transcranial Doppler studies have suggested that microemboli are released into the arterial circulation during the majority of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) procedures. This, together with the observation that neuropsychological performance may decline postoperatively, has led to concern that cerebral infarction may occur unrecognized during CEA. Our objective was to examine this risk with diffusion-weighted imaging, a technique that is highly sensitive to acute cerebral infarction.
METHODS: Eighteen participants (median age, 68 years; age range, 56–87 years) were assessed with diffusion-weighted imaging and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale before and after CEA. Imaging was performed using single-shot echo-planar imaging with a maximum diffusion sensitivity of b = 1000 s/mm2 applied to three orthogonal planes. Preoperative imaging was performed a median of 2.5 hours before surgery (range, 0.5–12.5 hours) and 15 hours after surgery (range, 1.5–58.5 hours). Two neuroradiologists independently interpreted the diffusion-weighted images, blinded to operative status and clinical findings.
RESULTS: There was no diffusion-weighted imaging evidence of silent embolism in this series of 18 participants (95% confidence interval limits, 0 to 10%). Clinical complications were confined to one case of confusion occurring after CEA; the diffusion-weighted imaging results were normal in this case.
CONCLUSION: There is no evidence from our series that silent cerebral infarction is a common occurrence during CEA. These data provide further support for the safety of CEA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  S. Schnaudigel, K. Groschel, S. M. Pilgram, and A. Kastrup New Brain Lesions After Carotid Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature Stroke, June 1, 2008; 39(6): 1911 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Maleux, P. Demaerel, E. Verbeken, K. Daenens, S. Heye, F. Van Sonhoven, A. Nevelsteen, and G. Wilms Cerebral ischemia after filter-protected carotid artery stenting is common and cannot be predicted by the presence of substantial amount of debris captured by the filter device. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1830 - 1833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. G. Roh, H. S. Byun, J. W. Ryoo, D. G. Na, W.-J. Moon, B. B. Lee, and D.-I. Kim Prospective Analysis of Cerebral Infarction After Carotid Endarterectomy and Carotid Artery Stent Placement by Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2005; 26(2): 376 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Yamamoto, T. Matsuoka, M. Toyoshima, T. Okuma, Y. Oyama, M. Hamuro, K. Nakayama, K. Inoue, K. Nakamura, and Y. Inoue Assessment of Cerebral Microembolism During Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Tumors Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1785 - 1789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. P. M. van Heesewijk, J. A. Vos, E. S. Louwerse, J. C. van den Berg, T. T. C. Overtoom, S. M. P. G. Ernst, H. W. Mauser, F. L. Moll, and R. G. A. Ackerstaff New Brain Lesions at MR Imaging after Carotid Angioplasty and Stent Placement Radiology, August 1, 2002; 224(2): 361 - 365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|