American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:664-669 (4 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLE
Enhancing Patterns in Multiple Sclerosis: Evolution and Persistence
a From the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast enhancement on MR images of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) is known to be associated with abnormalities of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, little is known about diagnostic patterns and common features of enhanced MS lesions. This study was designed to evaluate initial enhancement patterns, changes in these enhancing patterns, and duration of enhancement in a cohort of patients with MS.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with clinically definite MS were studied retrospectively. The appearance of enhancing lesions and sequential changes in the appearance on axial contrast-enhanced spin-echo images were evaluated. The enhancing lesions were classified as nodular, ringlike, or "other" (eg, arclike).
RESULTS: Of 301 new enhancing lesions, 205 (68%) showed nodular enhancement, 70 (23%) a ring pattern, and 26 (9%) a pattern neither nodular nor ringlike (eg, arclike). Two hundred eighty (93%) of 301 enhancing lesions disappeared within 6 months, and seven (2%) lesions showed persistent enhancement longer than 6 months. The other 14 (5%) lesions, which disappeared by the time of the next scan, were excluded, because the course between two examinations was longer than 6 months. Of nine persisting nodular enhancing lesions on the follow-up images, seven were decreased in size, whereas all of two persisting ringlike enhancing lesions on the follow-up images were larger than before.
CONCLUSION: Nodular enhancement is the predominant enhancement pattern for new MS lesions, and the temporal course of enhancement is usually shorter than 6 months. The appreciation of the evolution of MS-enhanced lesions aids in both identifying new MS lesions and distinguishing these lesions from other pathologic entities. This may be helpful in clinically evaluating the stage of MS lesions.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D.S. Meier, H.L. Weiner, and C.R.G. Guttmann MR Imaging Intensity Modeling of Damage and Repair In Multiple Sclerosis: Relationship of Short-Term Lesion Recovery to Progression and Disability AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1956 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ge Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1165 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Minneboo, B. M. J. Uitdehaag, H. J. Ader, F. Barkhof, C. H. Polman, and J. A. Castelijns Patterns of enhancing lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis are uniform within patients Neurology, July 12, 2005; 65(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Given II, B. S. Stevens, and C. Lee The MRI Appearance of Tumefactive Demyelinating Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 195 - 199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Cotton, H. L. Weiner, F. A. Jolesz, and C. R.G. Guttmann MRI contrast uptake in new lesions in relapsing-remitting MS followed at weekly intervals Neurology, February 25, 2003; 60(4): 640 - 646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


