Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ickowitz, V. Articles by Avni, F. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ickowitz, V. Articles by Avni, F. E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:767-772 (4 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Prenatal Diagnosis and Postnatal Follow-up of Pericallosal Lipoma: Report of Seven New Cases

Valérie Ickowitz^a, Danièle Eurin^a, Françoise Rypens^a, Pascale Sonigo^a, Isabelle Simon^a, Phillipe David^a, Francis Brunelle^a and Fred E. Avni^,a

^a From the Department of Pediatric Imaging, Charles Nicolle Hospital (V.I., D.E.), Rouen, France; the Department of Pediatric Imaging, Erasme Hospital (F.R., P.D., F.E.A.), University Clinics of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium; the Department of Pediatric Imaging (P.S., I.S., F.B.), Hôpital des Enfants Malades, Paris, France; and the Department of Pediatric Imaging, University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola (F.E.A.), Brussels, Belgium.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pericallosal lipomas are rare tumors. Few reports have included their imaging characteristics. Furthermore, little is known about their evolutive course. Our purpose was to describe the imaging features of seven cases of pericallosal lipoma diagnosed in utero and followed up after birth.

METHODS: We reviewed seven cases of pericallosal lipoma diagnosed by obstetric sonography (n = 7) and examined by fetal MR imaging (n = 5). Analysis of the complementary findings provided by fetal MR imaging was conducted. All findings were correlated with the postnatal imaging and clinical findings.

RESULTS: Obstetric sonography easily showed the pericallosal lipoma in all seven patients. In one, however, it was misinterpreted as intracranial hemorrhage. The morphology and integrity of the underlying corpus callosum were less easy to assess by using sonography. Fetal MR imaging confirmed the fatty content and location of the lesion in all five cases. It showed the choroidal extension in two patients and the type of associated callosal anomaly in another patient better than did sonography. In two patients, the lipoma grew, as revealed by subsequent postnatal MR imaging. The results of the neurologic examinations remained normal for the five surviving patients at a mean follow-up of 3 years (1 month–9 years).

CONCLUSION: Obstetric sonography is able to easily show pericallosal lipoma. Fetal MR imaging may be useful to characterize the lipomatous nature and the extension of the lipoma and the status of the corpus callosum. Long-term follow-up is necessary to understand the clinical consequences of such lesions.