Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Janssen, A. G. Articles by Castelijns, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Janssen, A. G. Articles by Castelijns, J. A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:845-850 (5 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Diameter of the Bony Lacrimal Canal: Normal Values and Values Related to Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Assessment with CT

Alfred G. Janssen^,a, Khaled Mansour^a, Johanna J. Bos^a and Jonas A. Castelijns^a

^a From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, De Tjongerschans Hospital, Heerenveen, the Netherlands (A.G.J.); the Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital, University of Groningen, the Netherlands (K.M.); the Department of Medical Informatics, Groene Land Verzekeringen, Zwolle, the Netherlands (J.J.B.); and the Department of Radiology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (J.A.C.).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Epiphora, or tearing due to primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO), is increasingly being treated with balloon dilatation. The cause of PANDO is unknown, but a small diameter of the bony nasolacrimal canal might be one of the etiologic factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the normal distribution of diameters of the bony canal and to ascertain whether there is an association between the diameter of the bony canal and primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

METHODS: Using axial CT, we measured the minimum diameter of the bony nasolacrimal canal in a control group of 50 men and 50 women and in 19 patients with PANDO.

RESULTS: The mean minimum diameter in the control group was 3.5 mm, which was smaller than expected on the basis of published data. The difference between the mean minimum diameter in men (3.70 mm) and that in women (3.35 mm) was significant. The mean minimum diameter in the patient group was 3.0 mm, which was significantly smaller than that in the control group. There was, however, considerable overlap.

CONCLUSION: A small diameter of the bony canal appears to be one of the etiologic factors in PANDO.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-i. Shigeta, H. Takegoshi, and S. Kikuchi Sex and Age Differences in the Bony Nasolacrimal Canal: An Anatomical Study Arch Ophthalmol, December 1, 2007; 125(12): 1677 - 1681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]