Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sunshine, J. L. Articles by Selman, W. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sunshine, J. L. Articles by Selman, W. R.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:915-921 (5 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology

ARTICLE

Benefits of Perfusion MR Imaging Relative to Diffusion MR Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hyperacute Stroke

Jeffrey L. Sunshine^,a, Nicholas Bambakidis^a, Robert W. Tarr^a, Charles F. Lanzieri^a, Osama O. Zaidat^a, Jose I. Suarez^a, Dennis M.D. Landis^a and Warren R. Selman^a

^a From the Departments of Radiology (J.L.S., R.W.T., C.F.L.), Neurosurgery (N.B., W.R.S.), and Neurology (O.O.Z., J.I.S., D.M.D.L.), University Hospitals of Cleveland & Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The development of thrombolytic agents for use with compromised cerebral blood flow has made it critical to quickly identify those patients to best treat. We hypothesized that combined diffusion and perfusion MR imaging adds vital diagnostic value for patients for whom the greatest potential benefits exist and far exceeds the diagnostic value of diffusion MR imaging alone.

METHODS: The cases of patients with neurologic symptoms of acute ischemic stroke who underwent ultra-fast emergent MR imaging within 6 hours were reviewed. In all cases, automatic processing yielded isotropic diffusion images and perfusion time-to-peak maps. Images with large vessel distribution ischemia and with mismatched perfusion abnormalities were correlated with patient records. All follow-up images were reviewed and compared with outcomes resulting from hyperacute therapies.

RESULTS: For 16 (26%) of 62 patients, hypoperfusion was the best MR imaging evidence of disease distribution, and for 15 of the 16, hypoperfusion (not abnormal diffusion) comprised the only imaging evidence for disease involving large vessels. For seven patients, diffusion imaging findings were entirely normal, and for nine, diffusion imaging delineated abnormal signal in either small vessel distributions or in a notably smaller cortical branch in one case. In all cases, perfusion maps were predictive of eventual lesions, as confirmed by angiography, CT, or subsequent MR imaging.

CONCLUSION: If only diffusion MR imaging is used in assessing patients with hyperacute stroke, nearly one quarter of the cases may be incorrectly categorized with respect to the distribution of ischemic at-risk tissue. Addition of perfusion information further enables better categorizing of vascular distribution to allow the best selection among therapeutic options and to improve patient outcomes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.M. Provenzale, K. Shah, U. Patel, and D.C. McCrory Systematic Review of CT and MR Perfusion Imaging for Assessment of Acute Cerebrovascular Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Roach, M. R. Golomb, R. Adams, J. Biller, S. Daniels, G. deVeber, D. Ferriero, B. V. Jones, F. J. Kirkham, R. M. Scott, et al. Management of Stroke in Infants and Children: A Scientific Statement From a Special Writing Group of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2644 - 2691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G TAN and T GODDARD Neuroimaging applications of multislice CT perfusion Imaging, June 1, 2007; 19(2): 142 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. K. Kuhl, J. Textor, J. Gieseke, M. von Falkenhausen, S. Gernert, H. Urbach, and H. H. Schild Acute and Subacute Ischemic Stroke at High-Field-Strength (3.0-T) Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging: Intraindividual Comparative Study Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 509 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Kloska, D. G. Nabavi, C. Gaus, E.-M. Nam, E. Klotz, E. B. Ringelstein, and W. Heindel Acute Stroke Assessment with CT: Do We Need Multimodal Evaluation? Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 79 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Carroll, H. A. Rowley, and V. M. Haughton Automatic Calculation of the Arterial Input Function for Cerebral Perfusion Imaging with MR Imaging Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 593 - 600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Latchaw, H. Yonas, G. J. Hunter, W. T.C. Yuh, T. Ueda, A. G. Sorensen, J. L. Sunshine, J. Biller, L. Wechsler, R. Higashida, et al. Guidelines and Recommendations for Perfusion Imaging in Cerebral Ischemia: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals by the Writing Group on Perfusion Imaging, From the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology of the American Heart Association Stroke, April 1, 2003; 34(4): 1084 - 1104. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Calamante, D.G. Gadian, and A. Connelly Quantification of Perfusion Using Bolus Tracking Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Stroke: Assumptions, Limitations, and Potential Implications for Clinical Use Stroke, April 1, 2002; 33(4): 1146 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. L. Sunshine Transient Ischemic Attacks: Added Specificity from Modern MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 4 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]