American Journal of Neuroradiology 22:1089-1096 (6 2001)
© 2001 American Society of Neuroradiology
ARTICLE
Quantitative MR Evaluation of Intracranial Epidermoid Tumors by Fast Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery Imaging and Echo-planar Diffusion-weighted Imaging
a From the Departments of Neurosurgery (S.C., K.K., K.A., Y.K.) and Radiology (J.T.), Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Hiroshima, and the Department of Neurosurgery (F.I.), Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Shimane, Japan.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Quantification of MR can provide objective, accurate criteria for evaluation of a given MR sequence. We quantitatively compared conventional MR sequences with fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (fast-FLAIR) and echo-planar diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging in the examination of intracranial epidermoid tumors.
METHODS: Eight patients with surgically confirmed intracranial epidermoid tumors were examined with T1-weighted MR sequences, fast T2- and proton densityweighted dual-echo sequences, fast-FLAIR sequences, and DW echo-planar sequences. We measured the MR signal intensity and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of epidermoid tumors, normal brain tissue, and CSF and calculated the tumor-to-brain and tumor-to-CSF contrast ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). Results were compared among the five MR methods.
RESULTS: On fast-FLAIR imaging, the mean signal intensity of epidermoid tumors was significantly higher than that of CSF but significantly lower than that of the brain; the contrast ratio and CNR of tumor-to-CSF were 4.71 and 9.17, respectively, significantly greater than the values with conventional MR imaging. On echo-planar DW imaging, epidermoid tumors showed a remarkably hyperintense signal relative to those of the brain and CSF; the mean contrast ratio and CNR of tumor-to-CSF were 13.25 and 19.34, respectively, significantly greater than those on fast-FLAIR or conventional MR imaging. The mean ADC of epidermoid tumors was 1.197 x 10-3 mm2/s, significantly lower than that of CSF but higher than that of brain tissues.
CONCLUSION: Fast-FLAIR imaging is superior to conventional MR imaging in depicting intracranial epidermoid tumors. Echo-planar DW imaging provides the best lesion conspicuity among the five MR methods. The hyperintensity of epidermoid tumors on echo-planar DW imaging is not caused by the diffusion restriction but by the T2 shine-through effect.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Venail, A. Bonafe, V. Poirrier, M. Mondain, and A. Uziel Comparison of Echo-Planar Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Delayed Postcontrast T1-Weighted MR Imaging for the Detection of Residual Cholesteatoma AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1363 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Chung, M. D. Murphey, C. S. Specht, R. Cube, and J. Smirniotopoulos From the Archives of the AFIP * Pediatric Orbit Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions: Osseous Lesions of the Orbit RadioGraphics, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 1193 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Inan, A. Arslan, G. Akansel, Y. Anik, H. T. Sarisoy, E. Ciftci, and A. Demirci Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Differential Diagnosis of Simple and Hydatid Cysts of the Liver Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1031 - 1036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Dubrulle, R. Souillard, D. Chechin, F. M. Vaneecloo, A. Desaulty, and C. Vincent Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Sequence in the Detection of Postoperative Recurrent Cholesteatoma Radiology, November 22, 2005; (2005) 2381041649. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Yamasaki, K. Kurisu, K. Satoh, K. Arita, K. Sugiyama, M. Ohtaki, J. Takaba, A. Tominaga, R. Hanaya, H. Yoshioka, et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Human Brain Tumors at MR Imaging Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 985 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Aikele, T. Kittner, C. Offergeld, H. Kaftan, K.-B. Huttenbrink, and M. Laniado Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging of Cholesteatoma in Pediatric and Adult Patients Who Have Undergone Middle Ear Surgery Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2003; 181(1): 261 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Stadnik, P. Demaerel, R. R Luypaert, C. Chaskis, K. L. Van Rompaey, A. Michotte, and M. J. Osteaux Imaging Tutorial: Differential Diagnosis of Bright Lesions on Diffusion-weighted MR Images RadioGraphics, January 1, 2003; 23(1): e7 - e7. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Maheshwari and S. K. Mukherji Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Recurrent Cholesteatoma from Granulation Tissue after Mastoidectomy: Case Report AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2002; 23(5): 847 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



